Battle Kaspersky Internet Security 2017 vs Comodo Internet Security 8?

Both can be configured for default-deny; so either one will work equally well in this regard.

If you want to create a lot of complicated rules, then I would wait until COMODO announces a fix for the "disappearing rules" bug.

However, it is free - and the sandbox can be configured to be default-deny - or you can just run with the auto-sandbox.

Personally, of the two, I favor COMODO - as I had better results with it on my specific systems.
 
I imagine we are talking about Comodo Internet Security & Kaspersky Internet Security 2016 or 2017 ?
Other should be removed as a poll option if you are only comparing the two.
You can edit the poll title and choices to be more specific.
I think you would be well served to remain with Kaspersky.
You could always take Comodo for a spin in a VM.
Comodo requires some effort on the users part more than some might want to do.
 
I imagine we are talking about Comodo Internet Security & Kaspersky Internet Security 2016 or 2017 ?
Other should be removed as a poll option if you are only comparing the two.
You can edit the poll title and choices to be more specific.
I think you would be well served to remain with Kaspersky.
You could always take Comodo for a spin in a VM.
Comodo requires some effort on the users part more than some might want to do.
I had other just in case there's something better than the 2
 
Take note of the "current bug" in Comodo. I would avoid it for now until that get fixed.
So my suggestion is keep Kaspersky as of now.

Why do you wanted to change Kaspersky?
And you licence is about to end, so you are looking for an other alternative ?
No, but I don't mind switching right now. My license ends in a month.
 
No, but I don't mind switching right now. My license ends in a month.
Then your in a position to try Comodo Internet Security.Nothing wrong with trying out another product.
There quite a few good products but it is difficult to make any decisions based on other members preferences.
Comodo is free,that is one advantage.Trying it will let you know if it is a good fit for you and your machine.
 
I'd voted "other" because I presently also happen to to be using a trio of products under the "other" category, Emsisoft I.S., Voodoo Shield Beta, and Zemana Anti-logger; but I went back, & changed my selection to "Comodo", instead, simply because you seem clearly prepared for a very "Comodo" Quest!:p:D Comodo was, in fact, the final AV/Firewall combo I'd used for our XP back in 2014. It was light, very confidence inspiring, and it's Auto Sandbox just made it that much more complete and satisfyingly secure!:D

You've nothing to lose as you'll come to decide for yourself which one you will ultimately prefer on your system.
Have a nice flight!;)
 
Last edited:
I'd voted "other" because I presently also happen to to be using a trio of products under the "other" category, Emsisoft I.S., Voodoo Shield Beta, and Zemana Anti-logger; but I went back, & changed my selection to "Comodo", instead, simply because your seem clearly prepared for a very "Comodo" Quest!:p:D Comodo was, in fact, the final AV/Firewall combo I'd used for our XP back in 2014. It was light, very confidence inspiring, and it's Auto Sandbox just made it that much more complete and satisfyingly secure!:D

You've nothing to lose as you'll come to decide for yourself which one you will ultimately prefer on our system.
Have a nice flight!;)
I second every word of this ;)
 
You're well served with either product, but, for protection as in prevention alone I personally would choose Comodo. However, You can configure both and either one will serve you well. The only real advantage I see with KIS is detection as well as prevention once configured correctly. Running Comodo Internet security with Zemana is a rock solid setup in my opinion though so I'd go with that. I really like CIS and KIS though and don't think you could go wrong with either.