Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Security Statistics and Reports
Learn more about Remediation Time – response time to security incidents (the results from protection test in January 2023)
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ForgottenSeer 98186" data-source="post: 1026224"><p>People use Firefox browser on Windows. So testing that configuration is a completely legitimate configuration and the results are legit as well.</p><p></p><p>It is difficult to see the objection as Microsoft Defender only missed 2 samples out of 447. In no way can the Microsoft Defender results be considered poor. The result is excellent. There should be no objection to the results nor any recommendation to not test Microsoft Defender with such a test system configuration.</p><p></p><p>Changing the test methodology so that Microsoft Defender produces better results is considered "gaming the system" by AMSTO. They have discussed the type of objection raised in this thread many times over the years and it is their official stance that it is against their recommendations.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ForgottenSeer 98186, post: 1026224"] People use Firefox browser on Windows. So testing that configuration is a completely legitimate configuration and the results are legit as well. It is difficult to see the objection as Microsoft Defender only missed 2 samples out of 447. In no way can the Microsoft Defender results be considered poor. The result is excellent. There should be no objection to the results nor any recommendation to not test Microsoft Defender with such a test system configuration. Changing the test methodology so that Microsoft Defender produces better results is considered "gaming the system" by AMSTO. They have discussed the type of objection raised in this thread many times over the years and it is their official stance that it is against their recommendations. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top
