Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Security Statistics and Reports
Learn more about Remediation Time – response time to security incidents (the results from protection test in January 2023)
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Andy Ful" data-source="post: 1026245" data-attributes="member: 32260"><p>[USER=98186]@Oerlink[/USER],</p><p></p><p>The particular AV results (missed samples) are not important, as you noticed. The problem is that the test shows an upside-down picture of how one of the tested AVs normally works (most detections should be Pre-Launch instead of Post-Launch and remediation time is probably incorrect too). That AV works so on about 5% of computers in the world. I am not sure if showing this was the intention of the testers. Furthermore, that AV is not tested on default settings (BAFS does not work).</p><p>The same problem would be with a giraffe mutant with a short neck, presented in the ZOO as the typical example of a giraffe species.</p><p>Of course, AVLab can still use Firefox and simply add the note, that Defender's BAFS does not work in the test. No problem. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite130" alt="(y)" title="Thumbs up (y)" loading="lazy" data-shortname="(y)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Andy Ful, post: 1026245, member: 32260"] [USER=98186]@Oerlink[/USER], The particular AV results (missed samples) are not important, as you noticed. The problem is that the test shows an upside-down picture of how one of the tested AVs normally works (most detections should be Pre-Launch instead of Post-Launch and remediation time is probably incorrect too). That AV works so on about 5% of computers in the world. I am not sure if showing this was the intention of the testers. Furthermore, that AV is not tested on default settings (BAFS does not work). The same problem would be with a giraffe mutant with a short neck, presented in the ZOO as the typical example of a giraffe species. Of course, AVLab can still use Firefox and simply add the note, that Defender's BAFS does not work in the test. No problem. (y) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top