Followed this thread to make linux look like Windows (with some small changes because I am not using Cinnamon but Xfce desktop and can change Linux Mint logo to Windows
) https://forums.linuxmint.com/viewtopic.php?p=2635179&hilit=Windows#p2635179
Nice, that’s a fun approach, especially on Xfce where you can tweak almost everything without too much overhead.Followed this thread to make linux look like Windows (with some small changes because I am not using Cinnamon but Xfce desktop and can change Linux Mint logo to Windows) https://forums.linuxmint.com/viewtopic.php?p=2635179&hilit=Windows#p2635179
Qubes and partitioned application environments are a bit over my head. TimeShift works great and is very easy to use. The only thing non tech savvy users like me have to figure out is to store the TimeShift backup on a different partition (because creating and managing partitions at Linux install is a bit more complicated than in Windows).Very good config. I have used most of your security controls. I just moved from Qubes to Fedora because I can SELinux semanage and confine the user to the user_r role. Which is a bit better than just plain standard user. And, I can mandate Yubikey use for sudo. Firejail does not work if you have confined the account to user_r; it complains about double 'confinment'. I kinda miss the virtualization protection of my non-networked Work cube. But I plan to add VirtualBox as replacement.
I haven't tried TimeShift before. How is that ?
Are you sure about this?The downside of Linux Mint (which also is an advantage) is that it is a lot of versions behind (now on Linux kernel 6.8 while 6.14 is out). This lagging behind also reduces the risk of exploits and increases stability a lot.
What version of Linux Mint are you using really? Because Linux Mint is based on Ubuntu LTS and 6.12 is the latest LTS kernel at the moment which is used by both Ubuntu LTS and Linux Mint. 6.8 was never a LTS kernel. So, something is not right on your Mint. You should check what's going on.
Nothing wrong (upgraded from 22.1)What version of Linux Mint are you using really? Because Linux Mint is based on Ubuntu LTS and 6.12 is the latest LTS kernel at the moment which is used by both Ubuntu LTS and Linux Mint. 6.8 was never a LTS kernel. So, something is not right on your Mint. You should check what's going on.
The Linux Kernel Archives
kernel.org
I see. I forgot that Ubuntu don't necessarily follow the same LTS versioning of the original unmodified kernel like most other non-Ubuntu based distros. The default Kernel 6.8 reached EOL on May 30, 2024, while Ubuntu's 6.8 is still supported.Nothing wrong (upgraded from 22.1)
Linux Mint 22.2 "Zara" ships with the Linux kernel 6.14 as the default for new installations, which is part of the HardWare Enablement (HWE) stack designed to support newer hardware, including recent AMD processors and improved power efficiency through dynamic P-State management. However, users upgrading from Linux Mint 22.1 or earlier will continue to use the LTS kernel 6.8.0-79 by default, as the upgrade path does not automatically switch to the newer HWE kernel to maintain stability on existing hardware. This decision is intentional, as the 6.8 kernel is supported until April 2029, while the 6.14 HWE kernel is only supported until February 2026.
I made a TimeShift snapshot and installed the latest 6.14 to give it a spin. Does not feel faster than 6.8I see. I forgot that Ubuntu don't necessarily follow the same LTS versioning of the original unmodified kernel like most other non-Ubuntu based distros. The default Kernel 6.8 reached EOL on May 30, 2024, while Ubuntu's 6.8 is still supported.
In the Linux Mint forum a forum veteran (with a website on Linux Mint tips) explained that using an older (supported) kernel makes you less vulnarable to exploits (that is why I mentioned that the disadvantage also is a an advantage).@LEO AI said:The 6.8 kernel is safe to use in Linux Mint 22.2, especially if your hardware is fully supported and your system is functioning correctly. The 6.8 kernel is a Long-Term Support (LTS) series, supported until April 2029, which makes it a stable and reliable choice for older hardware. If your current setup works well, there is no compelling reason to upgrade
Small change: I started getting "website not secure" messages a lot when I typed in a domain name in the taskbar of my browser. When I refreshed the browser, the website would appear but that started to get annoying. I tried changing from ControlD free to Quad9 and the problem disappeared.
Because Quad9 does not offer ad/tracking blocking like ControlD-free-with-OISD does, I replaced Avira with uBol with only Peter's Low list enabled and adding (currently) 23 cosmetic rules and 20 DNR rules (running uBol in basic mode). The cosmetic and DNR rules are all website specific, this means that I only have to disable Peter Low's list when I am doing work from home. In my surfing profile I have Brave shields in aggressive mode (no extensions in that profile)
action:
type: block
condition:
domainType: thirdParty
resourceTypes:
- websocket
- webtransport
---
@Sampei.Nihira
No my DNR rules are just for adblocking, cookie consent and two paywalls and are all website specifc, not so advanced as you made (I just discovered that uBol automatically translates ABP rules to DNR) and I installed uBol after changing to Quad9 (ComtrolD suddenly gave those connection erros, I just it for nearly a year with any issues).
action:
type: block
condition:
urlFilter: ||bbc.com/ngas/latest/dotcom-ads.js^
initiatorDomains:
- bbc.com
Yes, but my experience is that it skips static rules like ||example.org$script and only used the cosmetic rules.Yes, if I understand correctly, you mean importing cosmetic rules, for example from uBo, but obviously they must only be cosmetic filters.
It's the same as creating a new cosmetic filter.