Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Browsers
Chrome & Chromium
List of Interesting Experimental Flags for Google Chrome to Try Out
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DeepWeb" data-source="post: 776385" data-attributes="member: 63811"><p>chrome://flags/#enable-service-worker-servicification</p><p></p><p>I have seen a fast improvement in page lookups with this enabled.</p><p></p><p>I have an issue with the wording on top document isolation:</p><p>"In this mode, iframes from different third-party sites will be allowed to share a process."</p><p></p><p>So if enabled all third party iframes share a process as opposed to keeping them in separate processes? Wouldn't keeping it disabled be better for privacy?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DeepWeb, post: 776385, member: 63811"] chrome://flags/#enable-service-worker-servicification I have seen a fast improvement in page lookups with this enabled. I have an issue with the wording on top document isolation: "In this mode, iframes from different third-party sites will be allowed to share a process." So if enabled all third party iframes share a process as opposed to keeping them in separate processes? Wouldn't keeping it disabled be better for privacy? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top
