Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="kC77" data-source="post: 982244" data-attributes="member: 92796">well it was too slow to complete the test, most here can do 1000 samples in 6-15 minutes....after 1 hour 30, g-data hadnt even got through 100, it was really slow at deciding what to do with the samples, now if it was this slow and 100% accurate i could understand..... but it did miss a lot [SPOILER=&quot;process explorer after 100 approx samples (an hour and a half! later)&quot;][ATTACH=full]265448[/ATTACH][/SPOILER]also IDS alerts were tirggered showing whatever was missed was talking to the outside world[SPOILER=&quot;G-data IDS Alerts - Communication&quot;][ATTACH=full]265449[/ATTACH][/SPOILER]being so slow, it would probably take around 20+ hours to complete this test (if it even could as it was already infected after 1/10th of the samples being ran) but again this is an unrealistic/extreme test - G-Data is in a league of its own for how slow it is though, I wouldnt retest this</blockquote>

[QUOTE="kC77, post: 982244, member: 92796"] well it was too slow to complete the test, most here can do 1000 samples in 6-15 minutes.... after 1 hour 30, g-data hadnt even got through 100, it was really slow at deciding what to do with the samples, now if it was this slow and 100% accurate i could understand..... but it did miss a lot [SPOILER="process explorer after 100 approx samples (an hour and a half! later)"][ATTACH type="full"]265448[/ATTACH][/SPOILER] also IDS alerts were tirggered showing whatever was missed was talking to the outside world [SPOILER="G-data IDS Alerts - Communication"][ATTACH type="full"]265449[/ATTACH][/SPOILER] being so slow, it would probably take around 20+ hours to complete this test (if it even could as it was already infected after 1/10th of the samples being ran) but again this is an unrealistic/extreme test - G-Data is in a league of its own for how slow it is though, I wouldnt retest this [/QUOTE]

Verification