Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Security Statistics and Reports
Malware Protection Test March 2022
Message
<blockquote data-quote="devjit2020" data-source="post: 984350" data-attributes="member: 94800"><p>Exactly my grievances with ESET. No doubt their product is the lightest and their signature are one of the best(if not the best) but they simply refuse to listen to customer feedback and Marcos always defends the product when it fails. No product is 100% perfect and the developers should listen to customer feedback. A few of my clients have switched to other products from ESET because they were infected with ransomware. If ESET doesn't have a signature for a ransomware your files will be lost. I don't know how hard it is for the developers of ESET to implement an anti-ransomware module that'll stop the encryption and ask the user for decision when any unknown program atrempts to encrypt their files. Even local antivirus in my country like Quick Heal have this function. ESET is a tier 1 program compared to QH. My ESET license expires this month and I don't think I'll be renewing it. I have no complaints regarding their product but the absolute disregard of the company towards their customers feedback has made me think twice before renewing my subscription.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="devjit2020, post: 984350, member: 94800"] Exactly my grievances with ESET. No doubt their product is the lightest and their signature are one of the best(if not the best) but they simply refuse to listen to customer feedback and Marcos always defends the product when it fails. No product is 100% perfect and the developers should listen to customer feedback. A few of my clients have switched to other products from ESET because they were infected with ransomware. If ESET doesn't have a signature for a ransomware your files will be lost. I don't know how hard it is for the developers of ESET to implement an anti-ransomware module that'll stop the encryption and ask the user for decision when any unknown program atrempts to encrypt their files. Even local antivirus in my country like Quick Heal have this function. ESET is a tier 1 program compared to QH. My ESET license expires this month and I don't think I'll be renewing it. I have no complaints regarding their product but the absolute disregard of the company towards their customers feedback has made me think twice before renewing my subscription. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top