Battle Malwarebytes Anti-Malware Free vs Zemana AntiMalware Free

[Dirk41]

Well I think I said all above . Thank you in advance (I don't know what real word performance impact exactly means sorry )

 

[ZeroDay]

You might as well use both if it's just for on demand scanning.

 

[ForgottenSeer 55474]

Yes use both if you do not have real-time protection it do not matter

 

[Dirk41]

Thank you

I read ZEMANA offers real time protection for a short time . Is it possible to deactive it ?

It is not too aggressive ? ( I mean maybe it is likely to remove false positive that the OS needs? )

 

[Berny]

Also , and in addition to ZeroDay you might give a try to AdwCleaner.

 

[enaph]

Even with the realtime protection enabled you can still use them both as they are both designed to work next to the other solutions but my vote goes to ZAM as I like cloud solutions more than classical signature based ones.

 

[Berny]

Thank you
real time protection

It is recommended to avoid multiple protection layers ....

 

[Ink]

@Dirk41 You can use either or both for:

• On-demand scanning between Quick, Full, Custom or Context-Menu (Files & Folders)
• Offer a free trial to Premium features - thereafter revert to Free version.
• Real-time protection can be disabled.
• Background services will be installed - required by Premium editions.
• Manual Updates, Scans and Removal for no cost.
• During a scan, memory (RAM) usage will increase - this is normal behaviour.

Mod Edits
- Forums Rules apply. Do not use all Caps.

 

[Soulbound]

Thread close, existing threads about such topics. Refer to War Room guidelines.