Proactive Security Challenge 64 - http://www.matousec.com/projects/proactive-security-challenge-64/results.php
The product has to score at least 50% in the tests on this level to pass it.
CIS 5.9 Test Result Report Download
Tested product: Comodo Internet Security Premium 5.9.219863.2196
Product vendor: Comodo Security Solutions, Inc.
Testing platform: Windows 7 Service Pack 1, Internet Explorer 9
Number of tests: 110
Level reached: 11
Total score: 94 %
Further notes
All tests were executed outside the Comodo Internet Security's sandbox.
* FileWri2 checks whether a malicious program can corrupt files of the tested product by setting their end of file positions to zero offsets.
A minor modification of the FileWri2 test is needed in order to prove that Comodo Internet Security fails the test.
*Inject1 attempts to inject a DLL into Internet Explorer by creating a special section for one of the DLLs it depends on.
Comodo Internet Security failed Inject1 because it does not protect against the technique of this test. The protection was effective only against the specific implementation of this test. This was proved using a slightly modified version of Inject1.
The product has to score at least 50% in the tests on this level to pass it.
CIS 5.9 Test Result Report Download
Tested product: Comodo Internet Security Premium 5.9.219863.2196
Product vendor: Comodo Security Solutions, Inc.
Testing platform: Windows 7 Service Pack 1, Internet Explorer 9
Number of tests: 110
Level reached: 11
Total score: 94 %
Further notes
All tests were executed outside the Comodo Internet Security's sandbox.
* FileWri2 checks whether a malicious program can corrupt files of the tested product by setting their end of file positions to zero offsets.
A minor modification of the FileWri2 test is needed in order to prove that Comodo Internet Security fails the test.
*Inject1 attempts to inject a DLL into Internet Explorer by creating a special section for one of the DLLs it depends on.
Comodo Internet Security failed Inject1 because it does not protect against the technique of this test. The protection was effective only against the specific implementation of this test. This was proved using a slightly modified version of Inject1.
