Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Security Statistics and Reports
May 2021 - Advanced In The Wild Malware Test
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SeriousHoax" data-source="post: 948154" data-attributes="member: 78686"><p>Bitdefender product vs TrafficLight L1 will not be the same always. BD has SSL scanning and can detect and block scripts and hosts connected as third party which TrafficLight can't. Bitdefender's web protection is 100% system-wide so it's not bound to browsers only. Here, Bitdefender L1 > TrafficLight L1. </p><p></p><p>In some cases, for example; if "A(.)com/abc.exe" is downloaded by the browser where BD has no data about the host "A(.)com" but has signature/cloud data for the file "abc.exe" then TrafficLight will miss that file while Bitdefender will block it before it has finished downloading. So in scenarios like this, Bitdefender L1 > TrafficLight L1. </p><p></p><p>TrafficLight has one slight advantage and that is, it loads data from the cloud so it's always up to date with known malicious and phishing sites while Bitdefender relies on hourly signatures so there could be some delays. In such cases, TrafficLight will block more malicious sites than Bitdefender. This case has been tested and proven by some members here on the forum including me.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SeriousHoax, post: 948154, member: 78686"] Bitdefender product vs TrafficLight L1 will not be the same always. BD has SSL scanning and can detect and block scripts and hosts connected as third party which TrafficLight can't. Bitdefender's web protection is 100% system-wide so it's not bound to browsers only. Here, Bitdefender L1 > TrafficLight L1. In some cases, for example; if "A(.)com/abc.exe" is downloaded by the browser where BD has no data about the host "A(.)com" but has signature/cloud data for the file "abc.exe" then TrafficLight will miss that file while Bitdefender will block it before it has finished downloading. So in scenarios like this, Bitdefender L1 > TrafficLight L1. TrafficLight has one slight advantage and that is, it loads data from the cloud so it's always up to date with known malicious and phishing sites while Bitdefender relies on hourly signatures so there could be some delays. In such cases, TrafficLight will block more malicious sites than Bitdefender. This case has been tested and proven by some members here on the forum including me. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top