Privacy concerns have been raised for all of them and for any internet-connected software.Privacy concerns ;-)
Exactly, that's why I'm not to worried about it in general, and joked about F-Secure. My bigger issue would be with the likes of Facebook.But I just don’t understand the big deal with this data. As already mentioned not once or twice, every breach monitoring service (whether it will be through Experian, Equifax), whether it will be through your AV provider (Bitdefender, Webroot, Avast, Norton, Avira, F-Secure) all offer breach monitoring. All of them will collect the same information.
It’s not like they come and grab it out of your machine, you gotta give it yourself. So if you want the service, give it. If not, don’t give it.
I really don’t understand all the beating around the bush…
Privacy concerns have been raised for all of them and for any internet-connected software.
There is no evidence that any of them, other than Avast has ever compromised privacy.
Trend Micro is the only one apart from Avast to be involved in a privacy scandal over questionable mobile apps.
Ask ChatGPT and it will tell you.
You have no problem trusting Trend, but you have negativity towards McAfee which was never involved in a scandal.
It doesn’t really look objective, does it?
He left the company very early, his drugs and kids are not related to the software in any wayReally? No scandals at all? So we're ignoring John Mcafee, the founder and creator?
They all have large marketing departments, investing merely 4-5% in R&D and over 25% of the annual revenue in marketing.But, the software is not called Gates. Questionable decisions in life means questionable decision in everything. That alone leads me to not trust it, not that I trust anything with a large marketing department.
They all have large marketing departments, investing merely 4-5% in R&D and over 25% of the annual revenue in marketing.
So Norton is named after Peter Norton. What should we do now?
And why should I not use it? I wanna use it…?Don't use it. That goes for any anti-malware you can find boxed in retail. What part is hard to understand?
This made me laugh..Peter Nort....They all have large marketing departments, investing merely 4-5% in R&D and over 25% of the annual revenue in marketing.
So Norton is named after Peter Norton. What should we do now?
Kaspersky is named over an ex KGB mathematician. What’s the problem?
And why should I not use it? I wanna use it…?![]()
Eset is a private company, its not a corporation. You have absolutely no information how much Eset spends on marketing, unless you are the CFO of Eset.There are better out there. ESET's nod32, for example, puts greater emphasis on their product than on marketing. I prefer that.
It was nice with my tests and it is already polluted. With fanboyism.Thats why i stopped answering, i dont want this very nice topic polluted.
Yep, I'm tapping out of it, too. I'll use the word derailed (in which I had my part in that), rather than pollutedThats why i stopped answering, i dont want this very nice topic polluted.
ESET doesn't really advertise NOD32. They hide it as best they can on their website.There are better out there. ESET's nod32, for example, puts greater emphasis on their product than on marketing. I prefer that.