Question MD settings while using Avast-AVG

Please provide comments and solutions that are helpful to the author of this topic.
What does AVG's firewall have that Adv Firewall doesn't. Isn't it a front end for Adv Firewall ?
Windows firewall setting is unconvenient; no prompt for outbound connection (only inbound), and cannot create rule for a program per specific port (tried and failed); AVG firewall prompt and create a rule per port (and can select if outbound only or out and in, and permanent or once).
Also AVG firewall shows the currently active connections and the bandwidth usage by each.
 
What does AVG's firewall have that Adv Firewall doesn't. Isn't it a front end for Adv Firewall ?
Forgat to mention AVG firewall is very good, except with Edge; if selecting "ask" mode (for prompts), it will block Edge connection for few minutes after Edge launch even if it is "allowed" when prompted.
If selecting "smart" mode, Edge will connect, but will take half a minute to do.
The rest or browsers work just fine with AVG firewall, even with ask mode.
 
@Parkinsond have you ever tried Windows Firewall Control? it ads a front-end to windows firewall and allows a prompt for outbound connections.
ive been using it for years in my setups when not using Comodo and I can recommend it.
Yes, tried WFC; it is good, but when I select allow connection when prompted, it creates a rule for all ports; AVG offer me to select allow for the required port only or for all ports.
Capture.JPG
 
So it is better to keep those of MD turned off while using AVG.

I searched online and could only find this:


but the one who inquired never responded.

Since I forgot about AVG, I decided to search for that, too, and found


Maybe for AVG they mean that even though the features are toggled on, those from AVG actually take over and disable them.

Finally, elsewhere I read that various forum members advise leaving CI, etc., on, whether or not a third-party AV is used, because the effect on performance is minimal.
 
I searched online and could only find this:


but the one who inquired never responded.

Since I forgot about AVG, I decided to search for that, too, and found


Maybe for AVG they mean that even though the features are toggled on, those from AVG actually take over and disable them.

Finally, elsewhere I read that various forum members advise leaving CI, etc., on, whether or not a third-party AV is used, because the effect on performance is minimal.
Considering I cannot remember having virtualization enabled in BIOS, I disabled MD-related settings; most probably they will not work without virtualization.
 
And I contacted the developer of Wintoys asking him if there is an error in his app because it shows my virtualization-based security is off while my core isolation is on, and he answered that he is sure that no error from his side, even HWiNFO64 shows that it is not enabled.
 
Considering I cannot remember having virtualization enabled in BIOS, I disabled MD-related settings; most probably they will not work without virtualization.
I have mostly custom-built desktops, so it was a hassle to activate them. I think I had to go to BIOS and turn on virtualization, convert the boot drive from MBR to GPT for some machines, disable CSM and enable UEFI, reboot and go back to enable Secure Boot in BIOS, go into Windows, turn on Secure Boot, and remove each incompatible driver using Drive Store Explorer or rename the old drivers. Or something like that.
 
I disable every setting in WD along with its services when I use another AV ...

It is worth remembering that, like with other known methods, it is going to work until it doesn't. (y)
Disabling Core Isolation is a disadvantage of this method.
 
Last edited:
It is worth remembering that, like with other known methods, it is going to work until it doesn't. (y)
Disabling Core Isolation is a disadvantage of this method.
I don't need any of that crap

  • While highly effective, Core Isolation (specifically VBS) can sometimes cause a minor performance impact (e.g., 3-10% FPS drop in some games) on systems with less powerful hardware, but for most users with modern PCs, the security benefits outweigh this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Divine_Barakah
I don't need any of that crap

I also do not use Core isolation for some important reasons. However, it is not crap, even if you think that you do not need it.
You correctly added a quote:

... for most users with modern PCs, the security benefits outweigh this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spartan