Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Security Statistics and Reports
Modern protection without signatures – comparison test on real threats (Advanced In The Wild Malware Test)
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Adrian Ścibor" data-source="post: 977705" data-attributes="member: 71496"><p>As Andy replied to you - it depends on AV. In our tests, Level 3 is the most dangerous, because it is already running malware. That's why proactive protection and dynamic analysis in the cloud is in the game, e.g. for Avira (by the way, their infrastructure is based on a modified Cuckoo Sandbox, if anyone is interested - I think they have it described deep in the documents somewhere, or they had it in the past). Moreover the Cuckoo Sandbox is used in VoodooShield and in some project by CERT Poland: <a href="https://cert.pl/en/posts/2019/02/strengthening-our-malware-analysis-capabilities/" target="_blank">Strengthening our malware analysis capabilities</a></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Eset SS is included in March edition advanced in the wild malware test, therefore please follow me on this brilliant forum <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite109" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> Results will be available in mid April.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Adrian Ścibor, post: 977705, member: 71496"] As Andy replied to you - it depends on AV. In our tests, Level 3 is the most dangerous, because it is already running malware. That's why proactive protection and dynamic analysis in the cloud is in the game, e.g. for Avira (by the way, their infrastructure is based on a modified Cuckoo Sandbox, if anyone is interested - I think they have it described deep in the documents somewhere, or they had it in the past). Moreover the Cuckoo Sandbox is used in VoodooShield and in some project by CERT Poland: [URL="https://cert.pl/en/posts/2019/02/strengthening-our-malware-analysis-capabilities/"]Strengthening our malware analysis capabilities[/URL] Eset SS is included in March edition advanced in the wild malware test, therefore please follow me on this brilliant forum :) Results will be available in mid April. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top