Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="ForgottenSeer 98186" data-source="post: 1028669">I do know a lot about Mullvad as I often provide testing.I never defended Comodo. I just stated the facts. It is your problem that you cannot differentiate between someone merely pointing out the facts versus defending or promoting something.I could care less what Comodo does. And it is also a fact that a lot of people have unrealistic expectations of software companies. Comodo provides a freeware and if it wants to it can provide the most awful software that has ever existed. You and nobody else has any right to complain about it. It is a freeware. Comodo owes nothing to y&#039;all. So people should stop whining about Comodo and how it doesn&#039;t do this or that.Anybody that has paid even the slightest attention to Melih&#039;s posts over the years can plainly see that he could care less what freeloading whiners and complainers think about his free software. He has even told that group of people to go use something else.Read the Comodo EULA. It says &quot;provided As Is&quot; and &quot;You, the user, assume all the risk of the quality of the software.&quot;I never talked down one bit about Mullvad. The head developer freely admitted on its public GitHub page that they did not perform any testing of the 2023.1 client on Windows 11 22H2 before releasing it. Go to their GitHub page and take a look for yourself.Again, I test it. I do not need to be a subscriber. I get free licenses because I provide testing services. Did you even bother to read a word of what I previously posted about it? Obviously not. You just got triggered and had to make a rambling reply because in some way you interpreted what I posted as bashing Mullvad.Your interpretation of what is being posted is the problem. You&#039;re spinning it all with negativity. You should get yourself examined about that.None of it is spam. It is all fact. I provided the receipts.So you untrigger yourself and calm down.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="ForgottenSeer 98186, post: 1028669"] I do know a lot about Mullvad as I often provide testing. I never defended Comodo. I just stated the facts. It is your problem that you cannot differentiate between someone merely pointing out the facts versus defending or promoting something. I could care less what Comodo does. And it is also a fact that a lot of people have unrealistic expectations of software companies. Comodo provides a freeware and if it wants to it can provide the most awful software that has ever existed. You and nobody else has any right to complain about it. It is a freeware. Comodo owes nothing to y'all. So people should stop whining about Comodo and how it doesn't do this or that. Anybody that has paid even the slightest attention to Melih's posts over the years can plainly see that he could care less what freeloading whiners and complainers think about his free software. He has even told that group of people to go use something else. Read the Comodo EULA. It says "provided As Is" and "You, the user, assume all the risk of the quality of the software." I never talked down one bit about Mullvad. The head developer freely admitted on its public GitHub page that they did not perform any testing of the 2023.1 client on Windows 11 22H2 before releasing it. Go to their GitHub page and take a look for yourself. Again, I test it. I do not need to be a subscriber. I get free licenses because I provide testing services. Did you even bother to read a word of what I previously posted about it? Obviously not. You just got triggered and had to make a rambling reply because in some way you interpreted what I posted as bashing Mullvad. Your interpretation of what is being posted is the problem. You're spinning it all with negativity. You should get yourself examined about that. None of it is spam. It is all fact. I provided the receipts. So you untrigger yourself and calm down. [/QUOTE]

Verification