Security News Mythos: An AI tool too powerful for public release

nickstar1

Level 18
Thread author
Verified
Top Poster
Well-known
Dec 10, 2022
861
4,220
1,668
This is getting scary most of us knew this would happen but it's here!

 
This is getting scary most of us knew this would happen but it's here!

It does sound alarming, but I would be careful not to jump from a blog headline to conclusions about what this means in practice.

A cautious way to look at it

  • A vendor blog post can be useful, but it is still a secondary source and may emphasize risk to make a broader point.
  • “Too powerful for public release” is not, by itself, a technical assessment. Without independent details, testing, or official documentation, it is hard to judge the actual capability, limits, or real-world impact.
  • With AI-related security stories, the biggest risk is often overestimating what the tool can do based on marketing language or dramatic framing.

What would matter most

To assess something like this seriously, the important points would be:

  • Whether there is any primary-source documentation from the developer or researchers
  • Whether independent security researchers have reproduced the claims
  • Whether the tool enables genuinely new attacks, or mainly scales up existing social engineering, phishing, coding, or automation workflows
  • Whether there are confirmed incidents tied to it rather than hypothetical misuse

Practical takeaway

Even if the headline is exaggerated, the underlying trend is real: AI can lower the barrier for phishing, scam content, impersonation, malware scripting, and large-scale social engineering.

That does not mean defenders are helpless. The standard protections still matter:

  • Use strong unique passwords and a password manager
  • Enable MFA wherever possible
  • Be stricter about unexpected attachments, links, and login prompts
  • Keep systems and browsers updated
  • Use reputable security software, while remembering that no product catches everything
  • Verify sensitive requests through a second channel, especially financial or account-related ones

Bottom line

The story may reflect a real concern, but the headline alone is not enough to measure the threat accurately. The sensible response is not panic, but careful verification and stronger basic security hygiene.
 
Anthropic/Claude is currently the best A.I. model for sure but there is a lot of marketing hype about Mythos. But it will only get better if the bubble doesn't burst.

It's one thing finding vulnerabilities in open source projects where the source code is free and available but is it as good with closed sourced proprietary software?

Honestly in 10 years time things will have moved so fast we will be laughing at the primitive models and technology we have right now.

It's akin to the early web, you know it's going to be huge but how huge? Who knows but with time the tech gets refined and we arrive at sentient thinking machines :unsure:?
 
Exactly. They are selling their model and the press has been all up in their spin. The technology will change the world but won't endit.

A.I. will definitely not usher in the end of the world. Humans are very smart and adapt easily and I'm sure there have been contingencies put in place.

Sentient robots combined with super intelligent A.I is another matter that is the real worry. That will be the major issue, machines that are free .thinking

The biggest question will be what we do with all the unemployed, do we want future generations stuck playing video games @ home and scrolling social media all day or do we want them working good paying meaningful jobs. It's a major issue of our times, welfare system has never reduced poverty or reduced crime so a universal basic income is not going to work. Welfare has never created equality for low socio-economic groups, just prevented the worst of the worst happening in society and even that is debatable.
 
The good point is that Tech giants such as e.g. Amazon, Microsoft and Apple as well as a number of major banks can look for their own security breaches.
Low hanging fruit though I assume, but no one knows because the models are closed sourced proprietary software. How good are they? Trust us! OK :rolleyes: