Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
New video about defender on pc security Channel
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Zero Knowledge" data-source="post: 1122899" data-attributes="member: 57429"><p>The problem is not transparency, it's the fact he is taking cash for comments/videos. There is an incentive to pump sponsors that pay for regular segments/slots. Very few can resist the cash and if your not careful you will lose journalistic independence.</p><p></p><p>If you have a vested interest in keeping clients happy then you will probably become unbalanced and biased in the long term, in fact the money probably makes you even more bias because you want the cash to keep coming in. </p><p></p><p>Does it make his opinion invalid or the test invalid? No it doesn't but when you have vested interests you have to be honest and upfront otherwise your just taking cash for comments which to his credit he does. </p><p></p><p>There are some other excellent cyber sec pod casters/bloggers who do the same as Leo and to there credit they are honest about their vested interests.</p><p></p><p>He is basically saying and taking what we do for free on this forum on a daily basis and on other platforms like reddit and monetizing it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Zero Knowledge, post: 1122899, member: 57429"] The problem is not transparency, it's the fact he is taking cash for comments/videos. There is an incentive to pump sponsors that pay for regular segments/slots. Very few can resist the cash and if your not careful you will lose journalistic independence. If you have a vested interest in keeping clients happy then you will probably become unbalanced and biased in the long term, in fact the money probably makes you even more bias because you want the cash to keep coming in. Does it make his opinion invalid or the test invalid? No it doesn't but when you have vested interests you have to be honest and upfront otherwise your just taking cash for comments which to his credit he does. There are some other excellent cyber sec pod casters/bloggers who do the same as Leo and to there credit they are honest about their vested interests. He is basically saying and taking what we do for free on this forum on a daily basis and on other platforms like reddit and monetizing it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top