Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Norton
Norton seem to become "Tears of the Era"
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Begonia" data-source="post: 1091891" data-attributes="member: 114618"><p>I am not going to improve that Norton has become very bad just wanna tell that Norton's network protection became not as powerful as before.</p><p></p><p>Of course I know there are lots of malware and no antivirus can detect them all. I used to spend a whole summer holiday studying antivirus detections and malware samples. I have almost used every Antivirus that individuals can access that time. And I do think the <strong>detection rates </strong>exist. And according to my experience in testing malware, Avast is exactly very good.</p><p></p><p>In a word, I do not mean Norton will become bad I just mean if Norton give its own excellent tech up and turn into a skinned Avast, it will be a Tear of Era because Norton has Avastized. It is itself no more.</p><p></p><p>I'm afraid it's hard to really say which of them is better. It's also a matter of opinion to say whether Norton has really gotten better or worse. But I'm just a little surprised and disappointed because the status quo is so far from what I expected. Gen's behaviour doesn't make me agree with it, even if there is indeed a force majeure element to it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Begonia, post: 1091891, member: 114618"] I am not going to improve that Norton has become very bad just wanna tell that Norton's network protection became not as powerful as before. Of course I know there are lots of malware and no antivirus can detect them all. I used to spend a whole summer holiday studying antivirus detections and malware samples. I have almost used every Antivirus that individuals can access that time. And I do think the [B]detection rates [/B]exist. And according to my experience in testing malware, Avast is exactly very good. In a word, I do not mean Norton will become bad I just mean if Norton give its own excellent tech up and turn into a skinned Avast, it will be a Tear of Era because Norton has Avastized. It is itself no more. I'm afraid it's hard to really say which of them is better. It's also a matter of opinion to say whether Norton has really gotten better or worse. But I'm just a little surprised and disappointed because the status quo is so far from what I expected. Gen's behaviour doesn't make me agree with it, even if there is indeed a force majeure element to it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top