Do you happen to know the name of the Malwarebytes background service off the top of your head? (if not then don't worry about it)
Number of Real-time 3rd Party Security products
- Thread starter Logethica
- Start date
- Aug 3, 2013
- 1,879
Will the other features like ransom-ware protection etc.. will stay active even after disabling real time protection?
No, I no longer use Malwarebytes or other on-demand scanners. Launch a VM, install Malwarebytes to find out.Do you happen to know the name of the Malwarebytes background service off the top of your head? (if not then don't worry about it)
- Aug 2, 2015
- 4,286
I still run only 3 but they have changed to the following:
1> VoodooShield (Lifetime)
2> DeepArmor (Beta)
3> MalwareBytes 3.0.2 (Lifetime)
1> VoodooShield (Lifetime)
2> DeepArmor (Beta)
3> MalwareBytes 3.0.2 (Lifetime)
Last edited:
No, because the process for those components won't be running. I should have been clear, my example was in regards to Malwarebytes Anti-Malware. Never used any other Malwarebytes' software.
- Dec 29, 2014
- 1,717
Presently:
1a. 360 Total Security
1b. Private Firewall
3. MBAM Pro
4. EMET 5.2
360 covers alot of ground, so the first two were close. I was trying to decide how many I should say, because 360 includes a sandbox and some HIPS for folder and system/file protection. Private Firewall also has HIPS rules. On browser extensions, NoScript does employ anti-exploit protections as part of the add-on, so it's hard not to include it, even though I didn't to comply with the ground rules for the poll. NS blocks seen and unseen link redirects (when a site silently redirects from one location for a link to another where there could be invisible malware).
I see alot of potential in the concepts in EMET, but I think Comodo Firewall and CIS employ some good memory mitigation techniques natively. EMET doesn't really come with a strategy, and I have had a hard time developing one.
Private Firewall for the ease of managing connections and connection rules. It's really amazing how much easier PF makes this over the Windows firewall. The logging is excellent too, and I like that you can see even what processes do. MBAM in real time is as good as stated far and wide...
1a. 360 Total Security
1b. Private Firewall
3. MBAM Pro
4. EMET 5.2
360 covers alot of ground, so the first two were close. I was trying to decide how many I should say, because 360 includes a sandbox and some HIPS for folder and system/file protection. Private Firewall also has HIPS rules. On browser extensions, NoScript does employ anti-exploit protections as part of the add-on, so it's hard not to include it, even though I didn't to comply with the ground rules for the poll. NS blocks seen and unseen link redirects (when a site silently redirects from one location for a link to another where there could be invisible malware).
I see alot of potential in the concepts in EMET, but I think Comodo Firewall and CIS employ some good memory mitigation techniques natively. EMET doesn't really come with a strategy, and I have had a hard time developing one.
Private Firewall for the ease of managing connections and connection rules. It's really amazing how much easier PF makes this over the Windows firewall. The logging is excellent too, and I like that you can see even what processes do. MBAM in real time is as good as stated far and wide...
- Nov 15, 2016
- 867
1. HitmanPro.Alert
2. Emsisoft Internet Security
3. ZAM
Those are my three.
2. Emsisoft Internet Security
3. ZAM
Those are my three.
Two.
Comodo Firewall (à la @cruelsister)
Comodo Firewall (à la @cruelsister)
Proactive Security
HIPS disabled
Auto-sandbox all <Untrusted> applications
HMP.AHIPS disabled
Auto-sandbox all <Untrusted> applications
Max settings (enabled everything disabled, Vaccination, BadUSB, etc.)
- Sep 28, 2015
- 543
@In2an3_PpG Regarding EIS and ZAM—did you have to whitelist each other respectively?
- Aug 19, 2016
- 200
- Nov 15, 2016
- 867
I whitelisted EIS in ZAM but not vise versa. Have had no conflicts from EIS.
Similar threads
- Question
