Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="ForgottenSeer 107474" data-source="post: 1084161">Although a valid point in general, two remarks here:<ol>
<li data-xf-list-type="ol">Cruel Sister was the first to publish these tweaks (hence they are known as CS settings). So you can&#039;t blame her that she does test with Comodo using her non default settings. Her settings by the way have become the default settings for Comodo&#039;s business version (Xcitium), so what is considered default is not as black and white as stated anymore (CS rules are non default for Comodo, but are the default for Xcitium and Xcitium business version is not free, so free CIS being used with CS settings is to some degree justifiable). 
 
</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ol">In the first video an untweaked Defender was compared to an untweaked ESET, so that was an equal terms comparison (both on default). Microsoft Defender can also be hardened using Andy&#039;s configure Defender or Dan&#039;s Defender UI. </li>
</ol></blockquote>

[QUOTE="ForgottenSeer 107474, post: 1084161"] Although a valid point in general, two remarks here: [LIST=1] [*]Cruel Sister was the first to publish these tweaks (hence they are known as CS settings). So you can't blame her that she does test with Comodo using her non default settings. Her settings by the way have become the default settings for Comodo's business version (Xcitium), so what is considered default is not as black and white as stated anymore (CS rules are non default for Comodo, but are the default for Xcitium and Xcitium business version is not free, so free CIS being used with CS settings is to some degree justifiable). [*]In the first video an untweaked Defender was compared to an untweaked ESET, so that was an equal terms comparison (both on default). Microsoft Defender can also be hardened using Andy's configure Defender or Dan's Defender UI. [/LIST] [/QUOTE]

Verification