Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
Of LoLBins, 0-Days, ESET, and Microsoft Defender
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ForgottenSeer 107474" data-source="post: 1083454"><p>It is quite common for vendors to provide updates and patches for vulnabilities which have been discovered by white hat security analists using a PoC (Proof of Concept) that something can be exploited in a repeatable and predictable manner. When vendors take PoC's seriously, why do you consider an "actual in the wild distributed via route of infection" as the only valid proof?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ForgottenSeer 107474, post: 1083454"] It is quite common for vendors to provide updates and patches for vulnabilities which have been discovered by white hat security analists using a PoC (Proof of Concept) that something can be exploited in a repeatable and predictable manner. When vendors take PoC's seriously, why do you consider an "actual in the wild distributed via route of infection" as the only valid proof? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top