- Jul 14, 2015
- 782
Give it at least a few days to settle my friend ! hehe BD group expands.Switched to Bitdefender Free. So far, so good.
Last edited:
Give it at least a few days to settle my friend ! hehe BD group expands.Switched to Bitdefender Free. So far, so good.
Switched to Bitdefender Free. So far, so good.
A very good choiceSwitched to Bitdefender Free. So far, so good.
My configuration is saved in Wordpad so I can make quick changes to the thread!@oldschool click the security software like a bookmark.
Yes. Very lightweight and effective according to those who test but I haven't used it since v2.7xxxdo you have any experience trying wisevector instead of Voodoshileld?
I wouldn't bother with it myself. I generally use Defender alone with built-in Windows exploit protection. You may find exploit setup in first post above.hitman Pro is my 3rd alternate
This is the first time I hear about this search engine. How is it compared to other "private" engines?Switched to Gibiru search engine.
I think it's most like the old, i.e. original, Google before/without the tracking. It doesn't track, log or place cookies, it uses its own algorithm and I believe it relies the Google API. I like its results and uncluttered pages. The next closest results-wise is StartPage, in my opinion. Oh, and it's blazin' fast! I think DDG is way over-rated.This is the first time I hear about this search engine. How is it compared to other "private" engines?
Never was a fan of DDG's search results. Startpage was closest to google search results I think.I think it's most like the old, i.e. original, Google before/without the tracking. It doesn't track, log or place cookies, it uses its own algorithm and I believe it relies the Google API. I like its results and uncluttered pages. The next closest results-wise is StartPage, in my opinion. Oh, and it's blazin' fast! I think DDG is way over-rated.
I'm with you there.Never was a fan of DDG's search results.
And Gibiru may be a bit closer still.Startpage was closest to google search results I think.
Mr. Hill is known to be grumpy and stubborn. So I think he's trying to prove a point here with his uBO Minus. Google's main intention behind MV3 is to make extensions more restrictive, to make them less likely to do malicious stuff. If you follow that principle, then you get this barebone adblocking capability as what we have with uBO Minus.Settled on Adguard MV3 Experimental in Edge for now. It has more features than µBO Minus*.
* Editorial note: Gorhill must have a bug up his *** to dumb down his MV3 work and push this out. Why bother?