Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Vitali Ortzi" data-source="post: 1123265" data-attributes="member: 57714">It&#039;s on the list of unsupported providers because it downloads a list locally rather then using an API to do the filtering (logic and generally the size of the database will be a performance issue for a far less effective Malwarebytes)Basically personally I wouldn&#039;t use Malwarebytes an to me it&#039;s either osprey only or adding checkpoint (or any extension that&nbsp; has a technology against zero days )Actually maybe if someone knows how to get links that weren&#039;t published into intelligence providers then please test Some extensions against zero day pishing as anything remotely similar to popular pages will easily get blocked by checkpoint But a fake web store that doesn&#039;t try to emulate a different page usually passes checkpoint easily (some technologies in osprey providers should in real time understand better against this types but generally fake stores are hard to detect)</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Vitali Ortzi, post: 1123265, member: 57714"] It's on the list of unsupported providers because it downloads a list locally rather then using an API to do the filtering (logic and generally the size of the database will be a performance issue for a far less effective Malwarebytes) Basically personally I wouldn't use Malwarebytes an to me it's either osprey only or adding checkpoint (or any extension that has a technology against zero days ) Actually maybe if someone knows how to get links that weren't published into intelligence providers then please test Some extensions against zero day pishing as anything remotely similar to popular pages will easily get blocked by checkpoint But a fake web store that doesn't try to emulate a different page usually passes checkpoint easily (some technologies in osprey providers should in real time understand better against this types but generally fake stores are hard to detect) [/QUOTE]

Verification