Nice work. I wonder how much stronger Panda Advanced is with the Datashield and Application Control Modules which aren't present in the version you tested? My guess would be - significantly stronger. Still a great showing on that test.
Expired Panda Dome Essential Giveaway
- Thread starter sona
- Start date
Disclaimer: We cannot guarantee that all promo codes will remain active. Some offers have a short validation period and expire.
Nice work. I wonder how much stronger Panda Advanced is with the Datashield and Application Control Modules which aren't present in the version you tested? My guess would be - significantly stronger. Still a great showing on that test.
- Sep 22, 2014
- 1,767
Panda Dome Essentials have Firewall with IP and Application Control and it help a lot more then just Free version of Panda.
- Nov 19, 2012
- 1,121
I think they have improved their product and now they are giving away licenses to make themselves known to more and more people just like BD did.
Offline installer: http://acs.pandasoftware.com/Panda/PDE/190561/PDE.exe
- Jan 28, 2016
- 529
Yes, I think that's becoming more and more evident. The firewall in particular seems to be outstanding.
Winners announced :
Un nou concept de securitate cibernetică pentru home-users. Alăturați-vă și de a câștiga cu GOTD!
Un nou concept de securitate cibernetică pentru home-users. Alăturați-vă și de a câștiga cu GOTD!
Last edited:
- Nov 14, 2013
- 248
I couldn't find my name in the winner's list 
. But got some keys from other source :devil:
. But got some keys from other source :devil:
- Jul 14, 2015
- 775
Did not win here for Panda , but on another site got 1 year license for AVG IS
- Jan 25, 2018
- 300
Panda dome for me isn't good, it don't have quarantine files restoration available, nor it can to deactivate the protection through gui butons, just for that reason, it tries to make us believe that it is a super cool containment barrier, hahaha many false positives doesn't work for example keygens, cracks, patch, or unsigned unknown applications including those that you recompiling by yourself. eset is also good detecting all this, but it gives you the level of personalization/control on the options panel to restore files that are good or malicious and exclude them from realtime detection, in the end if you choose well your decision is what matters. .
What's the point of having an AV then if it alerts user that the file/programm is malicious but user is still going to run it whatever it takes, even temporarily disabling realtime protection for AV. Not talking about FP's that you can exclude, but about your first sentence part, and most stuff is more likely malicious than just simple "number generators". Eset users cried to devs to bring back right-click-icon option to "Temporarily disable realtime protection", they eventually brought it back, guess for what reasons did users needed it? The more sad fact is that some aren't even using illegal licenses of Eset. Plain stupidity who using patches/cracks to activate an AV products to protect them from the same malicious programms. Those who do it are novices.
Last edited by a moderator:
- Jan 25, 2018
- 300
What's the point of having an AV then if it alerts user that file/programm is malicious but user is still going to run it whatever it takes, even temporarily disabling realtime protection for AV. Not talking about FP's that you can exclude, but about your first sentence part, and most stuff is more likely malicious than just simple "number generators". Eset users cried to devs to bring back right-click-icon option to "Temporarily disable realtime protection", they eventually brought it back, guess for what reasons did users needed it?
Even panda realtime protection it does with my own containers packed ,.disassembled, and new recompiled EXE, and the antivirus only speculates, does not say or trace absolutely the line of attack, at least other products like some anti-exe's have viewers to throw information from the script content even when the executable is obfuscated. for same reason I abandoned the use of emsisoft, because their bb now doesn't say anything, it only says malicious malicious malicious, malware malware malware but not the relevant information what we wants. they insist that nobody learn about commandline used, or checking binary nfo inside executable, they wants at us to be an dependent on a speculator. At least emsisoft has its white list, and I really enjoyed using it. but his bb changed to automatic decisions this year.
You know that you have to manually download and install software upgrades for Panda, right? Very excellent indeed.
Last edited by a moderator:
Similar threads
