Expired Panda Dome Essential Giveaway

Disclaimer: We cannot guarantee that all promo codes will remain active. Some offers have a short validation period and expire.

How to get a license
1.go to https://www.giveawayoftheday.com/panda-dome-essential/
2. register and follow instructions on that page.
Here is the video test about FREE PANDA DOME vs Malware Pack from 4.4.2018



Nice work. I wonder how much stronger Panda Advanced is with the Datashield and Application Control Modules which aren't present in the version you tested? My guess would be - significantly stronger. Still a great showing on that test.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Av Gurus
Panda Dome Essentials have Firewall with IP and Application Control and it help a lot more then just Free version of Panda.
 
I think they have improved their product and now they are giving away licenses to make themselves known to more and more people just like BD did.
Yes, I think that's becoming more and more evident. The firewall in particular seems to be outstanding.
 
Panda dome for me isn't good, it don't have quarantine files restoration available, nor it can to deactivate the protection through gui butons, just for that reason, it tries to make us believe that it is a super cool containment barrier, hahaha many false positives doesn't work for example keygens, cracks, patch, or unsigned unknown applications including those that you recompiling by yourself. eset is also good detecting all this, but it gives you the level of personalization/control on the options panel to restore files that are good or malicious and exclude them from realtime detection, in the end if you choose well your decision is what matters. .
 
hahaha many false positives doesn't work for example keygens, cracks, patch, or unsigned unknown applications including those that you recompiling by yourself.
What's the point of having an AV then if it alerts user that the file/programm is malicious but user is still going to run it whatever it takes, even temporarily disabling realtime protection for AV. Not talking about FP's that you can exclude, but about your first sentence part, and most stuff is more likely malicious than just simple "number generators". Eset users cried to devs to bring back right-click-icon option to "Temporarily disable realtime protection", they eventually brought it back, guess for what reasons did users needed it? The more sad fact is that some aren't even using illegal licenses of Eset. Plain stupidity who using patches/cracks to activate an AV products to protect them from the same malicious programms. Those who do it are novices.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What's the point of having an AV then if it alerts user that file/programm is malicious but user is still going to run it whatever it takes, even temporarily disabling realtime protection for AV. Not talking about FP's that you can exclude, but about your first sentence part, and most stuff is more likely malicious than just simple "number generators". Eset users cried to devs to bring back right-click-icon option to "Temporarily disable realtime protection", they eventually brought it back, guess for what reasons did users needed it? :cautious:

Even panda realtime protection it does with my own containers packed ,.disassembled, and new recompiled EXE, and the antivirus only speculates, does not say or trace absolutely the line of attack, at least other products like some anti-exe's have viewers to throw information from the script content even when the executable is obfuscated. for same reason I abandoned the use of emsisoft, because their bb now doesn't say anything, it only says malicious malicious malicious, malware malware malware but not the relevant information what we wants. they insist that nobody learn about commandline used, or checking binary nfo inside executable, they wants at us to be an dependent on a speculator. At least emsisoft has its white list, and I really enjoyed using it. but his bb changed to automatic decisions this year.
 
panda is excellent but their support system sucks big time