- Mar 22, 2012
- 52
Yes , but ALSO Panda Firewall is committed to Bifdefender That difference is more stable in this senseI'd say BitDefender even though it slows down the system and internet, but the protection is fairly good.
If for that reason , it was fine but since 2015 versions do not think the new engine, sit well or still is adapting to cloud panda.Panda looked to be in great shape 2 months ago,but unfortunately it cooled off in October and November.And Bitdefender looks to be the more consistent program,not nesseseraly the best ,but always up there with the best...
Why u answer than when the thread is about wich is better panda or bitdefender? That makes no sense mate. Its like posthunting.
coz non of them is good. my opinion add other or non.Why u answer than when the thread is about wich is better panda or bitdefender? That makes no sense mate. Its like posthunting.
Comparision based on info read by AV tests, also MT users etc...!
Panda
-Pros
Little Data Collection: Collects the least amount of "Data" of almost any Anti-virus!
Light on System: Runs light on cloud and typically less buggy.
Soild Protection: Good all around protection.
Beating Competition: It's not McAfee or Windows Defender
-Cons
False Positive Land: Personally this isn't a big deal IMO.
Detection Rate: "Medium" It goes up and down.
Uninstalling: Could be a problem for Pro version.
Zero Day Protection: Needs some improvement,
not as impressive in testing as some other top solutions, such as Kapersky, ESET or Bitdefender.
Bitdefender
-Pros
Excellent Protection: Top of the line protection all around, on par with the best.
Zero Day Protection: Good here!
-Cons
Medium to Heavy on System: Not the best, or worst either... acceptable but not great.
Top Buggy Award: BUGGY! Wildcard in its behaviour on a system. Could be great, terrible or middle... one risky bugger for your precious PC.
Boot Time Slower: Increased about 5-15 secs extra, compared with other solutions.
I think both are about even, but I would give an edge to Bitdefender in protection but, Bitdefender can be a ****! ,... but Panda might run smoother on the system overall.
Can't vote... ~Tied~
I'd recommened a different paid product, such as Emsisoft! better code, lighter and less bugs, it uses same engine as Bitdefender + another engine
Emsisoft doesn't collect much data on its users, which is nice.
Yeah well I tried the Emsisoft one day, but was terrible I consumed more than 200mb of Ram thing which neither BitDefender (The probe before) I did not consume, stressed that tried the BitDefender & Panda before and as my license ESET defeated and I have to renew and both have an antivirus want to try one, the BitDefender if you somewhat slower start but not something that bothers me, and Panda is light and fast enough but it has a detection rate under a lot from the new light engine XMT this may be the engine change, and maybe then up again but for now, I think the option according BitDefender will see.
360ISI personally would use something with lower detection that actually runs properly on the computer.
I personally would use something with lower detection that actually runs properly on the computer.