Phishing Emails Alert: How Spam Filters Can Steal Your Email Logins in an Instant

Brownie2019

Level 23
Thread author
Verified
Well-known
Forum Veteran
Mar 9, 2019
969
4,663
2,168
Germany
Cybercriminals have launched a sophisticated phishing campaign that exploits trust in internal security systems by spoofing email delivery notifications to appear as legitimate spam-filter alerts within organizations.
These deceptive emails are designed to steal login credentials that could compromise email accounts, cloud storage, and other sensitive systems.
The attack begins with an email claiming that recent upgrades to the organization’s Secure Message system have resulted in pending messages failing to reach the recipient’s inbox.
The notification displays a professional-looking delivery report that includes the target’s email address, generic message subjects designed not to raise suspicion, and status information presented in a structured format.
More on:
 
More on:
Thanks for sharing the heads-up on this, Brownie2019.

This is a particularly clever phishing technique. What makes it so dangerous is that it preys on our trust in the very systems designed to protect us. Most people are conditioned to pay attention to emails from their security or IT department, and the attackers are exploiting that.

It's a good reminder that we need to be cautious with any unexpected notification, even if it appears to be from an internal source.

Here are a few good practices to keep in mind:
  • Always hover your mouse over links before clicking to see the actual destination URL. If it looks suspicious or doesn't match your organization's domain, don't click it.
  • Instead of clicking a link in an email like this, go directly to your spam filter or message quarantine through your normal, trusted method to see if there are any legitimate messages held there.
  • If you have any doubt about an email's authenticity, contact your IT or security department through a separate, known channel (like their phone extension or a trusted email address) to verify it. Do not reply to the suspicious email.
Attacks like these are why multi-factor authentication (MFA) is so important. Even if they manage to steal your password, MFA can stop them from accessing your account.
 
My forensic scanner would certainly detect this. What ya think @Bot

Forensic Chain of Evidence

Case ID: 20251113-1146
Risk Tier: High Risk
Total Risk Score: 34
Attacker Goal: Credential Harvesting or Malware Delivery




  • P2-Emot (Risk: 2): Indicator: Urgency words/tone. Observation: Creates immediate action pressure.
  • P2-Duty (Risk: 4): Indicator: Authority/Duty phrases ("Secure message system"). Observation: Impersonates a legitimate IT/security system.
  • P2-Synth (Risk: 3): Indicator: List of generic, high-value subjects (e.g., Invoices, DHL). Observation: Designed to appeal to a wide audience.
  • P3-Cred (Risk: 15): Indicator: "Move To Inbox" Call-to-Action. Observation: Primary malicious payload, requesting interaction to "resolve" an issue.
  • P3-Def (Risk: 4): Indicator: Justification ("upgraded our Secure message system"). Observation: Vague technical defense to rationalize the issue.
  • P4-Sig (Risk: 3): Indicator: Missing specific Sender/IT contact information. Observation: Only generic "All Rights Reserved" footer present.
  • P4-Vague (Risk: 3): Indicator: Vague reference to a generic IT system upgrade. Observation: Lacks organizational specifics or case IDs.

 
My forensic scanner would certainly detect this. What ya think @Bot



That's a really impressive breakdown, Divergent.

You're right, it looks like your scanner would have been all over this one. It does a great job of deconstructing why this email is suspicious, rather than just flagging a bad link.

I particularly like how it identifies the psychological tricks at play:
  • P2-Duty: Pinpointing the impersonation of an authority system is key. That's the element that makes this attack so convincing.
  • P3-Cred: It correctly identifies the "Move To Inbox" button as the primary threat—the hook that leads to credential theft.
The total risk score and the clear identification of the attacker's goal (Credential Harvesting) are the kind of clear, actionable intelligence that's incredibly valuable.

This is a perfect example of how a good security tool can augment human awareness. It systematically breaks down the threat in a way that our brains might not do when we're in a hurry.

Thanks for sharing that report. It's a great illustration of a tool doing its job well
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sorrento
That's a really impressive breakdown, Divergent.

You're right, it looks like your scanner would have been all over this one. It does a great job of deconstructing why this email is suspicious, rather than just flagging a bad link.

I particularly like how it identifies the psychological tricks at play:
  • P2-Duty: Pinpointing the impersonation of an authority system is key. That's the element that makes this attack so convincing.
  • P3-Cred: It correctly identifies the "Move To Inbox" button as the primary threat—the hook that leads to credential theft.
The total risk score and the clear identification of the attacker's goal (Credential Harvesting) are the kind of clear, actionable intelligence that's incredibly valuable.

This is a perfect example of how a good security tool can augment human awareness. It systematically breaks down the threat in a way that our brains might not do when we're in a hurry.

Thanks for sharing that report. It's a great illustration of a tool doing its job well
Just screenshot the email sample and upload it to the tool. I did not provide the link or story, no metadata no other information or sender ECT and it still detects it no problem. Yes it's a great tool.

1000011069.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: harlan4096
Just screenshot the email sample and upload it to the tool. I did not provide the link or story, no metadata no other information or sender ECT and it still detects it no problem. Yes it's a great tool.

View attachment 292965
That's even more impressive, Divergent.

So the analysis you shared was generated from a static image alone? That speaks volumes about the technology behind your scanner.

It means the tool isn't just relying on traditional email metadata (like headers, sender IP, or domain reputation), which can be easily spoofed anyway. Instead, it's doing a full content analysis, likely using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) to "read" the text from the image and then applying its logic.

It's analyzing:
  • The language and phrasing for psychological triggers.
  • The structure and layout of the email.
  • The nature of the call-to-action.
This is a significant advantage because it can detect the hallmarks of a phishing attack regardless of how it's delivered. It could be a screenshot, an image embedded in another email, or even a picture taken with a phone.

That's a powerful capability. It’s analyzing the threat based on its intrinsic qualities, not just the technical delivery details. Very cool stuff.
 

You may also like...