Our results reveal no statistically significant reduction in ad-blocking or anti-tracking effectiveness for MV3 ad blockers compared to their MV2 counter parts, and in some cases, MV3 instances even exhibit slight improvements in blocking trackers.
Our results reveal no statistically significant reduction in ad-blocking or anti-tracking effectiveness for MV3 ad blockers compared to their MV2 counter parts, and in some cases, MV3 instances even exhibit slight improvements in blocking trackers.
What was eye-catching for me, the number of Adblock users surpassed that of uBO.Necessity is the fire for innovation. If there is no difference then I'm happy, yet to switch to DNS/TLS blocking system wide but will as MV3 becomes normal.
Yeah news travels quick, surprised though uBlock has not missed a beat. If Brave adblocker is defeated then I will be sad and then we have problems.What was eye-catching for me, the number of Adblock users surpassed that of uBO.
I'm using uBO in Edge, but I know the day is coming to move to uBOL or to try Brave again.Of course, this tested only default settings and ignores µBO's advanced user mode, but I imagine even it offers no great advantages other than increased security and full user control of website behavior. MV3 will become the new normal for the majority of users, many of whom won't even bother with adblockers of any kind.
I wonder how long Edge will retain MV2? I assume they have deliberately worked around Chromium code MV3 defaults so I wonder ...I'm using uBO in Edge, but I know the day is coming to move to uBOL or to try Brave again.
Can it take care alone of the cosmetics without easylist?with Peter Lowe's only
No. I use UBOL for cosmetics and for sites with intrusive ads.Can it take care alone of the cosmetics without easylist?
Yes, I know; you mentioned using Peter Lowe list only in uBO combined with NextDNS.No. I use UBOL for cosmetics and for sites with intrusive ads.
Which is why I replied "No". Maybe my post wasn't clear.I was wondering if this list alone is capable of handling the cosmetic task.
No; it is clear; it's me got confused; you use Peter Lowe with NextDNS not uBO.Which is why I replied "No". Maybe my post wasn't clear.
Majority of users are even not aware of adblocking, it comes preinstalled, and those who are, are not willing to use it, for free! When I suggested it to my colleagues, they are like: I will skip youtube AD in 5-10 secs, it is no problem. I myself do not care, ADs are blocked in paid apps and I do not mind seeing blank spaces, it is less disturbing than actual ads.Necessity is the fire for innovation. If there is no difference then I'm happy, yet to switch to DNS/TLS blocking system wide but will as MV3 becomes normal.
But FYI, I do use Peter Lowe in µBO in advanced user mode on Edge and Firefox, along with a selection of very small, specialized lists. Network and cosmetic rules = ~ 12,000you use Peter Lowe with NextDNS not uBO.