Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
Question about tests...
Message
<blockquote data-quote="IceMan7" data-source="post: 1120485" data-attributes="member: 121355"><p>Why do you think LiveGuard is worse?</p><p>Bitdefender performs behavioral analysis on the computer on which it is installed and creates a virtual machine from it. Eset does the same but in the cloud.</p><p></p><p>The principle is the same. It is only constructed differently.</p><p>Of course, the Bitdefender or Kaspersky solution has been known for a long time and we can see their effects. Apart from that, Kaspersky probably does it in a similar way (correct me if I'm wrong) to Eset in the cloud.</p><p>Eset only now, after corrections from version 18, finally has it working.</p><p>In this topic, after the test, I myself asked if it was Eset's luck <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite110" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://malwaretips.com/threads/shadowras-big-comparative-episode-2-paid-antivirus.134313/[/URL]</p><p>I currently have a license for Fsecure and I was considering Bitdefender first.</p><p>But the current version of Eset, after testing here on the forum and online, gives a lot to think about <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite110" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p><p>I even installed Eset for 30 days and I can see that it works really well. Besides, Eset works so well and quickly on the computer that the computer got wind in its sails.<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite110" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p>If Eset refines LiveGuard, then together with DNA, HIPS and other solutions it can be at the level of BD or Kaspersky. Or even surpass them.</p><p>Therefore, being a fan of the BD solution, I am really curious how Eset will improve after some time and how LiveGuard will gain momentum. On paper, Eset looks much more advanced than BD. Because the cloud is the future. Because Eset is more stable and works much easier.</p><p>That is why in the appropriate topic I asked for another Eset vs BD comparative test, but more advanced, to see how completely different approaches to the same thing work in practice - on the computer (BD) and in the Eset cloud (plus a huge signature database).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="IceMan7, post: 1120485, member: 121355"] Why do you think LiveGuard is worse? Bitdefender performs behavioral analysis on the computer on which it is installed and creates a virtual machine from it. Eset does the same but in the cloud. The principle is the same. It is only constructed differently. Of course, the Bitdefender or Kaspersky solution has been known for a long time and we can see their effects. Apart from that, Kaspersky probably does it in a similar way (correct me if I'm wrong) to Eset in the cloud. Eset only now, after corrections from version 18, finally has it working. In this topic, after the test, I myself asked if it was Eset's luck ;) [URL unfurl="true"]https://malwaretips.com/threads/shadowras-big-comparative-episode-2-paid-antivirus.134313/[/URL] I currently have a license for Fsecure and I was considering Bitdefender first. But the current version of Eset, after testing here on the forum and online, gives a lot to think about ;) I even installed Eset for 30 days and I can see that it works really well. Besides, Eset works so well and quickly on the computer that the computer got wind in its sails.;) If Eset refines LiveGuard, then together with DNA, HIPS and other solutions it can be at the level of BD or Kaspersky. Or even surpass them. Therefore, being a fan of the BD solution, I am really curious how Eset will improve after some time and how LiveGuard will gain momentum. On paper, Eset looks much more advanced than BD. Because the cloud is the future. Because Eset is more stable and works much easier. That is why in the appropriate topic I asked for another Eset vs BD comparative test, but more advanced, to see how completely different approaches to the same thing work in practice - on the computer (BD) and in the Eset cloud (plus a huge signature database). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top
