I wouldn’t say they are different quality, they have different inspiration and purpose.LOL, it's baby steps my friend, baby steps, we're not talking about the depth and quality of the Eset or Kaspersky UI![]()
The McAfee designer seems to have been inspired by Google Material Design (the cards, the buttons, the pastel colours, the circular progress indicator), whilst Eset and Kaspersky follow the Microsoft-native glass and lights concept. They also give you plenty of options and settings whilst McAfee doesn’t give you none of that.
But the job is done, Malware is blocked, with or without parameters.
Kaspersky and Eset both use C++ and sciter for their UIs whilst McAfee looks to me as .net based solution and uses Web View.
Sciter is highly corporate way to design extremely fast and lightweight UIs, in the early years it was heavily funded by Norton and Norton was a showcase what is possible to achieve with this framework. Remember how their UI used to launch in milliseconds… well, this is Sciter.
However Sciter is one more language to master (the javascript declarations are slightly different), as well as one more dependency to manage. If there is vulnerability in Sciter, developers need to recompile their UI immediately. This often doesn’t happen.
Web View is managed by Microsoft so developers are increasingly moving away from Sciter to increase development speeds and reduce overhead.
Web View is also a full featured sandboxed chromium solution and as such can support Tailwind, Angular, React, Vue JS and many other frameworks that exist for a reason.






