Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="SomeRandomCat" data-source="post: 927978" data-attributes="member: 90137">I got the impression that they were attempting to pull off what Kaspersky did, in that the mainly accessible interface is simple for the novice user to tinker around with, and the more experienced settings are more deep into the GUI, and once I got used to it I really didn&#039;t have any real issues with it.The HIPS was almost as if none of their development team actually tried using it on a fresh install of Windows in interactive mode.&nbsp; They are one of the bigger more reputable companies, so it was a huge disappointment to see how out of touch it was with the rest of the suite.Overall I&#039;m a huge fan of the way Comodo designed their GUI (although I wouldn&#039;t say it&#039;s perfect).&nbsp; I really wish they would smooth a few things out and beef up their rule-creation options in the prompts.&nbsp; I keep going back to Kaspersky until Comodo pulls their head out of their a****.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="SomeRandomCat, post: 927978, member: 90137"] I got the impression that they were attempting to pull off what Kaspersky did, in that the mainly accessible interface is simple for the novice user to tinker around with, and the more experienced settings are more deep into the GUI, and once I got used to it I really didn't have any real issues with it. The HIPS was almost as if none of their development team actually tried using it on a fresh install of Windows in interactive mode. They are one of the bigger more reputable companies, so it was a huge disappointment to see how out of touch it was with the rest of the suite. Overall I'm a huge fan of the way Comodo designed their GUI (although I wouldn't say it's perfect). I really wish they would smooth a few things out and beef up their rule-creation options in the prompts. I keep going back to Kaspersky until Comodo pulls their head out of their a****. [/QUOTE]

Verification