I'm open to feedback![]()
Indeed. Super overkill. Stay safe, not paranoid.You probably don't need Cyberlock and SWH.
I'm open to feedback![]()
Indeed. Super overkill. Stay safe, not paranoid.You probably don't need Cyberlock and SWH.
I'm definitely not relying on signatures aloneYou probably don't need Cyberlock
Why not Avast free?What do you think?
Your ok with that setup.Removed
Added
- Kaspersky Standard (expired license, unable to buy again right now)
Configured as:
- BitDefender Free
- VoodooShield CyberLock
- Agressive mode, ALWAYS ON
- Do not automatically trust child process if allowed parent process
- Smart Firewall: Recommended
What do you think?
Considered it, but decided for BitDefender since it offers a better overall free experience. Less access to bloatware in their free version, less privacy scandals, and IMO a smarter behaviour blocker (plus an excellent signature database).Why not Avast free?
I've always liked BD. Free version has essentials except for memory protection IIRC. VS* is optional AFAIC.Considered it, but decided for BitDefender since it offers a better overall free experience. Less access to bloatware in their free version, less privacy scandals, and IMO a smarter behaviour blocker (plus an excellent signature database).
Yes, it lacks some important modules IMO, such as the following:I've always liked BD. Free version has essentials except for memory protection IIRC. VS* is optional AFAIC.
*It will always be Voodooshield to me.![]()
Those are availabe in Avast free.
Do you think Avast/AVG Free offer a more comprehensive and a smarter more complete protection than BD Free? Do you think, in ransomware attack or a RAT infection, Avast will perform better than BD Free? (take CyberLock out of the picture)Those are availabe in Avast free.
Yes, I do.Do you think Avast/AVG Free offer a more comprehensive and a smarter more complete protection than BD Free? Do you think, in ransomware attack or a RAT infection, Avast will perform better than BD Free? (take CyberLock out of the picture)