Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Security Statistics and Reports
Security test on the example of 400 malicious samples in the wild (November 2022)
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Andrezj" data-source="post: 1015677" data-attributes="member: 97580"><p>it is just basic av default configuration testing based upon amsto guidelines</p><p>none of the av are willing to pay for extended testing of their product with feature tweaks, hardened or maximum settings, even if they are willing then they would complain that the results are unfair because of feature differences in av products, that the tests are flawed</p><p>surely a test lab like avlab, which has done some more revealing tests in the past like script and banking trojans, has had challenge in getting the av makers to agree to those test methods or objections that test was not done properly</p><p>primarily because of lack of agreement on testing standards and methodology, this is why av tests are as they are, and there is amsto</p><p>certainly a capable lab like avlab is able and willing to do all the advanced testing that will reveal all the weaknesses and differences between av, if somebody is willing to pay for it</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Andrezj, post: 1015677, member: 97580"] it is just basic av default configuration testing based upon amsto guidelines none of the av are willing to pay for extended testing of their product with feature tweaks, hardened or maximum settings, even if they are willing then they would complain that the results are unfair because of feature differences in av products, that the tests are flawed surely a test lab like avlab, which has done some more revealing tests in the past like script and banking trojans, has had challenge in getting the av makers to agree to those test methods or objections that test was not done properly primarily because of lack of agreement on testing standards and methodology, this is why av tests are as they are, and there is amsto certainly a capable lab like avlab is able and willing to do all the advanced testing that will reveal all the weaknesses and differences between av, if somebody is willing to pay for it [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top