Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Security Statistics and Reports
Security test on the example of 400 malicious samples in the wild (November 2022)
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Adrian Ścibor" data-source="post: 1015688" data-attributes="member: 71496"><p>I disagree. Believe me, as a testing organization, you have contact with technical people at each vendor: CTO, CSO, Malware Analyst etc. They care about details, like MalwareTips Users, and want to learn as much as possible. I have yet to encounter a persuasion that we should change the result because they won't pay. Besides, you usually sign a contract for a whole year and both sides are the agreement. Regardless of the result, they still have to pay you. </p><p>You can agree not to publish the results. That's why sometimes in the tests the name is given: vendor A, Vendor B etc. They have feedback, but you don't show negative results.</p><p>They may suggest something, but never dictate how you should do something. That's why it suits some vendors and not others.</p><p>But this is normal. You work with people who want it. You don't talk to someone if they don't want it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Adrian Ścibor, post: 1015688, member: 71496"] I disagree. Believe me, as a testing organization, you have contact with technical people at each vendor: CTO, CSO, Malware Analyst etc. They care about details, like MalwareTips Users, and want to learn as much as possible. I have yet to encounter a persuasion that we should change the result because they won't pay. Besides, you usually sign a contract for a whole year and both sides are the agreement. Regardless of the result, they still have to pay you. You can agree not to publish the results. That's why sometimes in the tests the name is given: vendor A, Vendor B etc. They have feedback, but you don't show negative results. They may suggest something, but never dictate how you should do something. That's why it suits some vendors and not others. But this is normal. You work with people who want it. You don't talk to someone if they don't want it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top