Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Security Statistics and Reports
Security test on the example of 400 malicious samples in the wild (November 2022)
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ForgottenSeer 97327" data-source="post: 1015691"><p>[USER=69540]@Digmor Crusher[/USER] and [USER=92939]@Shadowra[/USER] </p><p></p><p>I don't think that the AV-labs test with old samples. My guess is that meta-data is the issue. When you have programs on your PC and execute them they have a different meta and or telemetry data trail than when they are delivered through mail. downloaded from the internet or executed from an USB. When AV's become smarter, the tests have to incorporate this extra knowledge gained from meta data and telemetry data points. </p><p></p><p>Machine learning and Artificial Intelligence does not work well with wrong data points. So the same sample used by Shadowra and AV-labs could have different result simply because they were tested in a different context. All suspicious security forum members think the AV-labs tests are bogged. My guess is that they are not bogged or manipulated. The AV's tested just want to make sure their products are tested with the use-cases they are designed to protect for.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ForgottenSeer 97327, post: 1015691"] [USER=69540]@Digmor Crusher[/USER] and [USER=92939]@Shadowra[/USER] I don't think that the AV-labs test with old samples. My guess is that meta-data is the issue. When you have programs on your PC and execute them they have a different meta and or telemetry data trail than when they are delivered through mail. downloaded from the internet or executed from an USB. When AV's become smarter, the tests have to incorporate this extra knowledge gained from meta data and telemetry data points. Machine learning and Artificial Intelligence does not work well with wrong data points. So the same sample used by Shadowra and AV-labs could have different result simply because they were tested in a different context. All suspicious security forum members think the AV-labs tests are bogged. My guess is that they are not bogged or manipulated. The AV's tested just want to make sure their products are tested with the use-cases they are designed to protect for. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top