Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Security Statistics and Reports
Security test on the example of 400 malicious samples in the wild (November 2022)
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Andrezj" data-source="post: 1015748" data-attributes="member: 97580"><p>government, academic and independent researchers who pentest, vuln hunt are independent, they can test however they want, they can report as they want</p><p>though few researchers pentest for av feature design weaknesses because those are already known or av bug bounty does not pay well</p><p>independent researchers do it for profit, seeking the remote code vulns and then selling them for six figures, few of those researchers care about av, they chase vulnerabilities in the software that is installed across the globe</p><p>the problem is the consumer must search for, study and understand the results</p><p>though not much help because the av company can decide not to fix and not publish that fact, ask [USER=71496]@Adrian Ścibor[/USER] av companies do not fix problems found in avlab tests</p><p>usa nsa, israeli unit 8200, uk gchq, and similar hack av to oblivion, they know all the weaknesses and will not reveal</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Andrezj, post: 1015748, member: 97580"] government, academic and independent researchers who pentest, vuln hunt are independent, they can test however they want, they can report as they want though few researchers pentest for av feature design weaknesses because those are already known or av bug bounty does not pay well independent researchers do it for profit, seeking the remote code vulns and then selling them for six figures, few of those researchers care about av, they chase vulnerabilities in the software that is installed across the globe the problem is the consumer must search for, study and understand the results though not much help because the av company can decide not to fix and not publish that fact, ask [USER=71496]@Adrian Ścibor[/USER] av companies do not fix problems found in avlab tests usa nsa, israeli unit 8200, uk gchq, and similar hack av to oblivion, they know all the weaknesses and will not reveal [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top