Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
Shadowra's Big Comparative : Episode 2 - Paid Antivirus
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Vitali Ortzi" data-source="post: 1113743" data-attributes="member: 57714"><p>[USER=99014]@Trident[/USER] you're an expert on checkpoint</p><p></p><p>I was wondering why can't they make script detection more aggressive for consumers as they usually dont make much use of scripts and does zone alarm send local scripts to emulation ?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>How does it decide what local files to send to emulation ?</p><p></p><p></p><p>Btw what do you think about adding another extension like Symantec as I find in my tests that Symantec has more pishing pages in it's catagoriztion based webfilter (webpulse)</p><p></p><p>(Checkpoint catagoriztion is above average from what I seen but does miss too much pishing pages and feels like it has to depend in some cases on the superior ai based zero pishing tech and that tech isn't perfect against fake stores but it is nearly perfect at detecting popular brands pishing pages)</p><p></p><p>Adding Symantec helped a lot to detect fake stores and did help against some pishing pages it missed as well</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>(Thanks to emulation and zero pishing Checkpoint is although not perfect is in my opinion the best overall against web threats over any other extension that majority use primitive catagoriztion only )</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Vitali Ortzi, post: 1113743, member: 57714"] [USER=99014]@Trident[/USER] you're an expert on checkpoint I was wondering why can't they make script detection more aggressive for consumers as they usually dont make much use of scripts and does zone alarm send local scripts to emulation ? How does it decide what local files to send to emulation ? Btw what do you think about adding another extension like Symantec as I find in my tests that Symantec has more pishing pages in it's catagoriztion based webfilter (webpulse) (Checkpoint catagoriztion is above average from what I seen but does miss too much pishing pages and feels like it has to depend in some cases on the superior ai based zero pishing tech and that tech isn't perfect against fake stores but it is nearly perfect at detecting popular brands pishing pages) Adding Symantec helped a lot to detect fake stores and did help against some pishing pages it missed as well (Thanks to emulation and zero pishing Checkpoint is although not perfect is in my opinion the best overall against web threats over any other extension that majority use primitive catagoriztion only ) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top