Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
Shadowra's Big Comparative : Episode 2 - Paid Antivirus
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Vitali Ortzi" data-source="post: 1113772" data-attributes="member: 57714"><p>Fake stores seems like an impossible thing to fully combat but actually I have seen checkpoint zero pishing a few times able to detect even some random fake pets shops and all kinds of fake stores wich did surprise me as it's not trained on much fake stores</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Symantec (webpulse ) has its own ai based catagoriztion that can usually detect more fake stores Meanwhile checkpoint has a superior solution for pishing so for now I found the solution is just using multi vendors and adding blocking of uncategorized only in checkpoint and adding suspicious catagory to Symantec (causes a decent amount of false positives but when I see suspicious in Symantec or uncategorized detection in checkpoint while browsing I'm more careful entering personal information and kinda use it like a web based hips that blocks nearly every fake store , pishing page as I have ran probably thousands of pishing sites over recent months and specifically ones from open pish never bypassed the multi extension setup but some local pishing pages gathered from sms messages reposted in cyber related groups , a few fake stores from artists against 419 database where able to)</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>What I absolutely love about Checkpoint is that they make some incredible research many times when I look for a paper about an evasion tactic , apt there is a decent chance checkpoint will have a convenient blog post about it and even better that they add detection for it in the emulation blade , other blades</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Interesting how they use reputation well and actually although Symantec endpoint protection uses reputation etc as well but unfortunately unlike checkpoint it has higher false positives ratio from my experience</p><p></p><p>So checkpoint is well balanced although it needs to change some defaults in the consumer product (urlf should be set in background,they should automatically scan web forms like .css rather then only scanning when interacting with the web form like Symantec does as zero pishing scanning can be annoying, they should make small signature option enabled by default if the machine has under 6 gigabyte of ram ,cruel sister showed it's possible to bypass the ransomware protection in zone alarm so that has to be improved) [MEDIA=youtube]vYvep2Rar8M[/MEDIA] )</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Vitali Ortzi, post: 1113772, member: 57714"] Fake stores seems like an impossible thing to fully combat but actually I have seen checkpoint zero pishing a few times able to detect even some random fake pets shops and all kinds of fake stores wich did surprise me as it's not trained on much fake stores Symantec (webpulse ) has its own ai based catagoriztion that can usually detect more fake stores Meanwhile checkpoint has a superior solution for pishing so for now I found the solution is just using multi vendors and adding blocking of uncategorized only in checkpoint and adding suspicious catagory to Symantec (causes a decent amount of false positives but when I see suspicious in Symantec or uncategorized detection in checkpoint while browsing I'm more careful entering personal information and kinda use it like a web based hips that blocks nearly every fake store , pishing page as I have ran probably thousands of pishing sites over recent months and specifically ones from open pish never bypassed the multi extension setup but some local pishing pages gathered from sms messages reposted in cyber related groups , a few fake stores from artists against 419 database where able to) What I absolutely love about Checkpoint is that they make some incredible research many times when I look for a paper about an evasion tactic , apt there is a decent chance checkpoint will have a convenient blog post about it and even better that they add detection for it in the emulation blade , other blades Interesting how they use reputation well and actually although Symantec endpoint protection uses reputation etc as well but unfortunately unlike checkpoint it has higher false positives ratio from my experience So checkpoint is well balanced although it needs to change some defaults in the consumer product (urlf should be set in background,they should automatically scan web forms like .css rather then only scanning when interacting with the web form like Symantec does as zero pishing scanning can be annoying, they should make small signature option enabled by default if the machine has under 6 gigabyte of ram ,cruel sister showed it's possible to bypass the ransomware protection in zone alarm so that has to be improved) [MEDIA=youtube]vYvep2Rar8M[/MEDIA] ) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top
