Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="IceMan7" data-source="post: 1120101" data-attributes="member: 121355">Thank you for your quick responseExactly. One test. More comparisons of Eset vs BD would be useful, because they are probably the best AV today.In this test, Eset won by a small margin. BD detected but blocked the operation. And that is the difference on one sample and one comparative testEset recently had an update and only then it works properly. It recently had an update of Fsecure and we know how it ended - no commentWhen can we expect a newer version of Bitdefender? Does anyone know?Is Bitdefender already a stable program like Eset and its programmers have already achieved? Does BD still have its &quot;jumps&quot; and can surprise with some bug?Thanks for the opinions. If one can consider impressions, then I still think that Bitdefender&#039;s behavioral protection is at a higher level than Eset&#039;s, despite the Slovak&#039;s progress.However, they have been working on it for years, developing it. Eset has only just achieved it and it will take some time before they work it out. So that it doesn&#039;t end up that Eset will improve and BD will go to a higher level <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite116" alt=":D" title="Big grin&nbsp; &nbsp; :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" />Bitdefender is also more user-friendly - just turn on AutoPilot and it works in the background and does its thing. Eset needs to be properly configured and is more annoying with its notifications.Eset has definitely improved visibly. Eset is lighter than BD (although BD Photon does the job too) and has always been a more stable software.&nbsp;But Eset&#039;s prices compared to BD are outrageous. What are they charging so much for? This is shocking.I will have to think about it and observe tests and opinions (I hope more of your Eset vs BD comparison tests <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite115" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue&nbsp; &nbsp; :p" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":p" />), because I still have Fsecure paid for until September 2025, so for now it stays (but I paid for it)Regards</blockquote>

[QUOTE="IceMan7, post: 1120101, member: 121355"] Thank you for your quick response Exactly. One test. More comparisons of Eset vs BD would be useful, because they are probably the best AV today. In this test, Eset won by a small margin. BD detected but blocked the operation. And that is the difference on one sample and one comparative test Eset recently had an update and only then it works properly. It recently had an update of Fsecure and we know how it ended - no comment When can we expect a newer version of Bitdefender? Does anyone know? Is Bitdefender already a stable program like Eset and its programmers have already achieved? Does BD still have its "jumps" and can surprise with some bug? Thanks for the opinions. If one can consider impressions, then I still think that Bitdefender's behavioral protection is at a higher level than Eset's, despite the Slovak's progress. However, they have been working on it for years, developing it. Eset has only just achieved it and it will take some time before they work it out. So that it doesn't end up that Eset will improve and BD will go to a higher level :D Bitdefender is also more user-friendly - just turn on AutoPilot and it works in the background and does its thing. Eset needs to be properly configured and is more annoying with its notifications. Eset has definitely improved visibly. Eset is lighter than BD (although BD Photon does the job too) and has always been a more stable software. But Eset's prices compared to BD are outrageous. What are they charging so much for? This is shocking. I will have to think about it and observe tests and opinions (I hope more of your Eset vs BD comparison tests :p), because I still have Fsecure paid for until September 2025, so for now it stays (but I paid for it) Regards [/QUOTE]

Verification