Should Comodo users stop using Comodo?

[rashmi]

Alice: For CIS users, CIS 2025 is probably a better solution than popular home AVs.

Bob: For Comodo critics, popular AVs are a better solution than CIS.

We can easily settle the dispute on the following statement:
It is hardly possible to prove that Alice or Bob is wrong.

Alice's clever use of "probably" reveals her maturity, making Bob's certainty seem childish in comparison—Alice is right! Bob is not wrong, but he "probably" is stupid!

 

[Divergent]

Alice's clever use of "probably" reveals her maturity, making Bob's certainty seem childish in comparison—Alice is right! Bob is not wrong, but he "probably" is stupid!

It sounds like you’re suggesting anyone not using Comodo is stupid, is that what you mean?

 

[Andy Ful]

As for Bob and Alice, they got along perfectly well until outside influences decided it was necessary to divide them.

So, we lost some time. But now, finally, the dispute can be closed in peace.

Now, let me ask you an important question, do you actually use Comodo on your own system, or do you rely on Windows’ built-in security along with your own configuration tweaks and tools?

I do not have a stable security configuration. Due to developing security applications, I often experiment with different AVs with different configurations and often disable the protection.
I consistently use my applications on the computers of friends and family.

If it’s the latter, could you explain why you prefer the built-in security over third-party solutions?

It is simple. Why should I use third-party solutions if all I need is already in Windows? A different case is with users who have problems with managing the Windows built-in security layers. They may need third-party solutions.

 

[Andy Ful]

Alice's clever use of "probably" reveals her maturity, making Bob's certainty seem childish in comparison—Alice is right! Bob is not wrong, but he "probably" is stupid!

To avoid misunderstandings, I corrected my post by adding "probably" to Bob's statement.

 

[Divergent]

So, we lost some time. But now, finally, the dispute can be closed in peace.

At this stage, it feels like the damage is already done.

 

[Andy Ful]

But this is one of the fundamental reasons that the internet became so rapidly adopted by the hoomans. Everybody has a "voice" and they have to have their say. The more logic and decorum that is used and enforced, the less popular the platform becomes - and people leave. People want the flamewars and drama.

Agree, a reasonable balance is welcome. The balance between the forum's popularity and sensibility.

 

[Andy Ful]

At this stage, it feels like the damage is already done.

Yes, some happy Comodo users became less happy due to the high criticism, and some posters in this thread, too due to my requests for clear evidence for high criticism.
However, all have a chance to be happier now.

Post slightly edited to be clearer.

 

[Divergent]

Yes, some happy Comodo users became less happy during the dispute, and some posters in this thread, too.
However, all have a chance to be happier now.

I’d argue that some users have paid a heavier price in these debates over time, in fact, more than their fair share. Wouldn’t it be fair if everyone paid the same price?

 

[Parkinsond]

Yes, some happy Comodo users became less happy due to the high criticism, and some posters in this thread, due to my requests for clear evidence for high criticism.
However, all have a chance to be happier now.

The Pursuit of Happyness

 

[Andy Ful]

I’d argue that some users have paid a heavier price in these debates over time, in fact, more than their fair share. Wouldn’t it be fair if everyone paid the same price?

Maybe, however, we do not have someone objective who could decide which party is hurt more.

 

[Andy Ful]

The Pursuit of Happyness

Per aspera ad astra.

 

[Divergent]

Maybe, however, we do not have someone objective who could decide which party is hurt more.

Users have faced moderation and even bans over this issue, losing everything in the process, which seems rather severe. What’s more concerning is that others commit similar actions without repercussions. It doesn’t take much observation to see the imbalance here, and if one were to record such instances over time, the inconsistencies of corruption would become clear.

 

[Miravi]

LOL faking to be staff member. Sad thing is he/they would probably be a good employee for them. Shows loyalty and passion.

I love the internet, something crazy everyday .

I'm trying to figure out what there was to gain. It's one thing to put yourself out there as a knowledgeable fan... but a fraud posing as an employee? C'mon.

 

[Andy Ful]

Users have faced moderation and even bans over this issue, losing everything in the process, which seems rather severe.

I am not in a position to decide who was hurt more. I am sorry if someone was hurt more than was necessary.

What’s more concerning is that others commit similar actions without repercussions. It doesn’t take much observation to see the imbalance here, and if one were to record such instances over time, the inconsistencies of corruption would become clear.

The imbalance is present because after entering the staff, I decided not to ask for the removal of the off-topic posts anymore.
There is also the opposite imbalance. Those who might feel hurt by moderation posted in this thread more off-topic posts (with no moderation) than others.

 

[simmerskool]

I was glad that somebody from Comodo showed up in our forum; reflects on the company that they cared. Too bad he's a fake.

who showed up as comodo staff (former staff?), we KNOW that how? I can state that I am NOT comodo staff, but who knows for sure other than me? Maybe I missed the credential check?

 

[Trident]

I'm trying to figure out what there was to gain. It's one thing to put yourself out there as a knowledgeable fan... but a fraud posing as an employee? C'mon.

I mean come on, from the user posts it could clearly be seen they are not an employee.

@simmerskool it was Nikola Milanovic.

 

[simmerskool]

People want the flamewars and drama.

agree to disagree

 

[Divergent]

I am not in a position to decide who was hurt more. I am sorry if someone was hurt more than was necessary.

Ah, but you have, you’ve sparked more than one crusade against others over similar topics, creating division and unrest, much like what’s happening in this thread. You seem to believe your posts are beyond reproach, yet I’ve seen you deliberately derail discussions and fuel division before.

 

[outlawxtorn]

Ah, but you have, you’ve sparked more than one crusade against others over similar topics, creating division and unrest, much like what’s happening in this thread. You seem to believe your posts are beyond reproach, yet I’ve seen you deliberately derail discussions and fuel division before.

I think you need to let this go. It almost seems obsessive trying to get one up on Andy.

 

[Divergent]

I think you need to let this go. It almost seems obsessive trying to get one up on Andy.

It’s not about trying to one-up anyone, it’s about maintaining a fair and balanced environment here. No one should be above the rules or allowed to treat other members unfairly. I also haven’t noticed you participating in these discussions before, so I’m curious, what sparked your sudden interest?