I think we were quite clear in what we said and how we said it. None of us said anything bypassed Comodo (at the moment or before the commentary). These practices of over-defensiveness and over-excitement (combined with many others) + the questionable Comodo quality (I mean I downloaded from an official Comodo page an installer that was 130 mb with revoked signature, I turned off SAC, later on I found out there is another installer 90 mb), all that fuels distrust and criticism.If I correctly understand, the @cruelsister point of view is as follows:
No one showed the hash of malware that surely bypassed Comodo in the wild, so our thread does not make sense in practice. Comodo users are safe. People who say that there can be some weaknesses in Comodo are sensation-seeking or intentionally try to discourage Comodo users.
So, let's hear what other Comodo users think about it.
Whenever I’ve discovered products being bypassed, I’ve shared the details and hashes.