New Update Sigma: A new chromium AI-based browser

Parkinsond

Parkinsond

Level 62
Thread author
Verified
Well-known
Dec 6, 2023
5,185
14,800
6,069
Run AI Offline
Sigma Eclipse Local LLM lives inside your laptop and stays available anytime, anywhere.

Open-Source & Transparent
Built on open-source code that anyone can verify. No third-party tracking, no hidden processes.

Intelligent Browsing
Let SigmaGPT transform how you interact with the web. From instant summaries to content generation, browser AI intelligence is now at your fingertips.

www.sigmabrowser.com

Sigma AI Browser

Sigma AI Browser handles your online activities directly from your browser. From booking and planning to automating workflows
www.sigmabrowser.com www.sigmabrowser.com
Click to expand...
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: Sampei.Nihira, Brahman, Khushal and 1 other person
K's heuristics have found the browser exe to be malicious. The file is not digitally signed.
1.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Wow
  • +Reputation
Reactions: Miravi, Sorrento, Khushal and 3 others
  • Wow
  • Applause
  • Like
Reactions: Brahman, Sorrento, Sampei.Nihira and 1 other person
Sorrento said:
I've been using Mullvad browser most of the time manly for web viewing & it does a great job for that, I still have FF on for YouTube etc but happy with Mullvad, worth a try....
Click to expand...
After playing with all kinds of browsers, even the most exotic, I decided with stay with most two reliable with highest market share, regardless of any bugs or lack of features.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
  • HaHa
Reactions: Brahman, Khushal and Sorrento
I no longer trust cloned browsers, and the issue of delayed security updates must first be resolved. I'm not talking about a delay of a day or two, as is the case with Brave and Vivaldi browsers, which is acceptable, but at least a whole week. I was a happy user of the Waterfox browser until I discovered that it had not yet been updated to the latest version of Firefox ESR, even though it was a critical security update.

Thanks to @Marko :) for telling me this earlier, and now I'm back to using Firefox again.
 
  • Hundred Points
  • Love
  • +Reputation
Reactions: Sampei.Nihira, Marko :), Miravi and 3 others
lokamoka820 said:
I no longer trust cloned browsers, and the issue of delayed security updates must first be resolved. I'm not talking about a delay of a day or two, as is the case with Brave and Vivaldi browsers, which is acceptable, but at least a whole week. I was a happy user of the Waterfox browser until I discovered that it had not yet been updated to the latest version of Firefox ESR, even though it was a critical security update.

Thanks to @Marko :) for telling me this earlier, and now I'm back to using Firefox again.
Click to expand...
It is Estonian; Estonia is a beutiful country

Country Estonia GIF
 
  • Like
Reactions: lokamoka820 and Marko :)
lokamoka820 said:
I no longer trust cloned browsers, and the issue of delayed security updates must first be resolved. I'm not talking about a delay of a day or two, as is the case with Brave and Vivaldi browsers, which is acceptable, but at least a whole week. I was a happy user of the Waterfox browser until I discovered that it had not yet been updated to the latest version of Firefox ESR, even though it was a critical security update.

Thanks to @Marko :) for telling me this earlier, and now I'm back to using Firefox again.
Click to expand...
I love seeing people using common sense and following my advice. I'll just add that 99% of features Firefox forks have can usually be added in Firefox itself through about:config. The only difference is forks come with those settings enabled by default, and Firefox doesn't.
 
  • Hundred Points
  • Like
Reactions: lokamoka820, Sampei.Nihira and Parkinsond
Marko :) said:
I love seeing people using common sense and following my advice. I'll just add that 99% of features Firefox forks have can usually be added in Firefox itself through about:config. The only difference is forks come with those settings enabled by default, and Firefox doesn't.
Click to expand...

Unfortunately, I can't because Chrome is about 52.5% faster than Firefox in my Speedometer 3.1 test.
Or you could say that Firefox is about 34.4% slower than Chrome.;)
 
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: lokamoka820, Marko :) and Parkinsond
Sampei.Nihira said:
Unfortunately, I can't because Chrome is about 52.5% faster than Firefox in my Speedometer 3.1 test.
Or you could say that Firefox is about 34.4% slower than Chrome.;)
Click to expand...
And that's okay.

I already said, this test doesn't indicate anything really. It's only a tool for developers of the web browser to find the areas where they need to work on; nothing else. I get the same result as you for Firefox, yet, Firefox loads websites faster than Chrome on my Lenovo Legion laptop. I remember I even provided you with the screenshots with console open.

From what I read, the reason why Firefox lacks behind Chrome and Safari is their approach; in order to compete with Chrome, they'd need to rewrite entire engine, but they won't do that because they prefer security over speed.

I couldn't care less about those browser benchmark honestly. As long as the web browser is secure, fast and renders websites properly, I'll use it.
 
  • +Reputation
  • Hundred Points
Reactions: lokamoka820, Parkinsond and oldschool

You may also like...