Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="mkaz" data-source="post: 877843" data-attributes="member: 75847">Thanks for all inputs, I forgot to mention, I&nbsp; have malwarebytes premiumThis is a good idea, still kind of hesitance how both will play out, After that update, it caused so much headache to revert it back to normal. It is a joke, Kaspersky has huge list of incompatible software.&nbsp; I wonder why that is the case<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite129" alt=":sneaky:" title="Sneaky&nbsp; &nbsp; :sneaky:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":sneaky:" />Honestly, I had that combo, but their change in updates caused problem with secondary anti-malware. Btw is syshardener similar to O&amp;O ShutUp10&nbsp;Definitely need some tweaking, so that both are not doing the same thing. There security software are always a resource hog. &nbsp;If you had to list by resources it took, what would you pick. Is Norton and BitDefender still heavy to use</blockquote>

[QUOTE="mkaz, post: 877843, member: 75847"] Thanks for all inputs, I forgot to mention, I have malwarebytes premium This is a good idea, still kind of hesitance how both will play out, After that update, it caused so much headache to revert it back to normal. It is a joke, Kaspersky has huge list of incompatible software. I wonder why that is the case:sneaky: Honestly, I had that combo, but their change in updates caused problem with secondary anti-malware. Btw is syshardener similar to O&O ShutUp10 Definitely need some tweaking, so that both are not doing the same thing. There security software are always a resource hog. If you had to list by resources it took, what would you pick. Is Norton and BitDefender still heavy to use [/QUOTE]

Verification