Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="i7ii" data-source="post: 1117838" data-attributes="member: 116614">Walls of text infused with verbal diarrhea - where part of the statements are clearly subjective and void of reality (even contradicting yourself - which is also ironic - since your contradictions are proving my previous points) - is highly unproductive (pure wasted time). Seriously, even increasing the font and using bold text....<img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="🤦‍♂️" title="Man facepalming&nbsp; &nbsp; :man_facepalming:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/6.6/png/unicode/64/1f926-2642.png" data-shortname=":man_facepalming:" /> Which again, it&#039;s highly ironic in a contradictory way - after making it sound like we&#039;re living in a cyber-utopia for past decade:Which is way way way way way to farfetched from objective reality.Maybe that&#039;s true for your subjective reality - i don&#039;t know the extents of your personal life for past decade - nor do i care&nbsp; (highly irrelevant for the subject in question), but it&#039;s highly egocentric - to make such general assumptions for the rest of the world. Who knows, maybe in your personal world A.I. is still a comic book fantasy, while in objective reality - it&#039;s an active phenomenon - even a new age of technological advancements (impacting hacking as well). And since i mentioned A.i. - we also have public access to such tools and thus, we can get detailed and accurate objective responses. Here&#039;s such answer for your decade old dilemma for example&nbsp; - since it&#039;s also on-topic:Hacking has evolved significantly from 2015 to 2025, with advancements in both attack techniques and defensive technologies. Here&#039;s a comparison of the key changes over the decade:</blockquote>

[QUOTE="i7ii, post: 1117838, member: 116614"] Walls of text infused with verbal diarrhea - where part of the statements are clearly subjective and void of reality (even contradicting yourself - which is also ironic - since your contradictions are proving my previous points) - is highly unproductive (pure wasted time). Seriously, even increasing the font and using bold text....🤦‍♂️ Which again, it's highly ironic in a contradictory way - after making it sound like we're living in a cyber-utopia for past decade: [B][SIZE=4]Which is way way way way way to farfetched from objective reality.[/SIZE][/B] Maybe that's true for your subjective reality - i don't know the extents of your personal life for past decade - nor do i care (highly irrelevant for the subject in question), but it's highly egocentric - to make such general assumptions for the rest of the world. Who knows, maybe in your personal world A.I. is still a comic book fantasy, while in objective reality - it's an active phenomenon - even a new age of technological advancements (impacting hacking as well). And since i mentioned A.i. - we also have public access to such tools and thus, we can get detailed and accurate objective responses. Here's such answer for your decade old dilemma for example - since it's also on-topic: Hacking has evolved significantly from 2015 to 2025, with advancements in both attack techniques and defensive technologies. Here's a comparison of the key changes over the decade: [/QUOTE]

Verification