Honestly, any properly coded default-deny security-software such as SecureAPlus, Comodo, Kaspersky - they are all going to be extremely easy to use for the average person. The reason I say this, is because the average person won't be downloading anything that isn't already in said product's white-list, so they won't have to answer prompts or check the sandbox.
I think its good these test include such software, especially since it is the default configuration when installing them. It has always been absolutely insane to me that so many AntiVirus companies depend on blacklisting. There are always going to be 0-day threats and for both the experienced PC user and novice alike, those are the real problem.
For a couple hundred bucks just about anyone can pay an experienced coder to whip a reliable RAT up and bypass signature detection (even more so now days, than 20 years ago). The average user isn't going to have heuristics on high, and even if they did, most products still wouldn't be likely to properly detect something properly packed with a cert.
I do think it's a bit scary though that they all trust certificates signed by certain companies by default, but I guess those are more rare cases.
SecureAPlus is not a default-deny product in a way Comodo is. When you find a new file, it has to be undetected by all cloud AV vendors and local APEX AI for it becomes fully unknown to you. And on new versions it automatically allows some programs.
SecureAge Technology has announced the addition of a new feature to its SecureAPlus application control solution so that home users don't need to become cyber security experts. Automatic Mode…
www.globalsecuritymag.com
On Comodo you will much more often encounter unknown programs and all you will have is bad signatures, inadequate BB and virtualization.
Kaspersky is working well for people though.
I played around with SecureAPlus a couple weeks ago, and I thought default-deny was setup out of the box, but maybe I remember wrong and had to set it to that.