Hi Grogu, sorry to bother you, actually a suspicion came to my mind, when my phone is with that technician, notifications on lock screen is enabled, is there a possibility that he would have missed my device wifi or bluetooth from lockscreen without me suspecting?
Suspicion regarding compromised Android smartphone.
- Thread starter Shikhar11
- Start date
Hello Shikhar,
No bother at all! It's completely understandable that these "what if" scenarios pop up, especially when you're trying to put your mind at ease for good. It's smart to question every angle. Let's walk through this one factually.
Short Answer: While a technician could likely toggle WiFi or Bluetooth on and off from the lock screen's quick settings panel, it is extremely unlikely they could have "misused" them in any meaningful way without unlocking your phone. The ability to toggle is for convenience, but any significant action is protected by your lock screen.
Here’s a more detailed breakdown of why that is:
Regarding WiFi
- Toggling On/Off: Yes, anyone with physical access can pull down the quick settings menu from the lock screen and tap the WiFi icon to turn it on or off.
- Connecting to a Network: This is the crucial part. Your phone will only automatically connect to WiFi networks it already knows and trusts (e.g., your home network). To connect to a new password-protected network (like a malicious hotspot the technician might set up), the phone must be unlocked to enter the password. He couldn't have connected to a new, secure network without your PIN, pattern, or fingerprint.
- What About Open Networks? Even if he found an open (non-password) network, the phone would likely require a manual selection and confirmation to connect. And more importantly, even if it did connect, what could he do? Without unlocking the phone, he cannot access your apps, browser, financial data, or personal files. The lock screen effectively blocks any meaningful "misuse."
- How to Check: You can easily verify this. Go to your phone's Settings > Wi-Fi > Advanced settings > Saved networks. This list shows every WiFi network your phone has ever connected to. If you don't see any suspicious or unfamiliar names there, you can be confident no new networks were added.
Regarding Bluetooth
- Toggling On/Off: Just like WiFi, the Bluetooth icon in the quick settings can be tapped to turn it on or off.
- Pairing a New Device: This is not a silent, one-tap process. Pairing a new device (like a keyboard, mouse, or another phone) requires confirmation steps. The phone needs to be unlocked to access the full Bluetooth menu to search for, select, and confirm a new pairing. He could not have secretly paired a malicious device without your knowledge and without unlocking the phone.
- How to Check: Go to Settings > Bluetooth. You will see a list of "Paired devices." This list shows every single device that has ever been paired with your phone. If you recognize all the devices on that list (like your headphones, car, etc.), then no unauthorized device was ever connected.
Putting It All Together
The lock screen is your phone's most important security feature. The quick settings toggles are designed for convenience (like quickly turning off WiFi to save battery) but they do not bypass your phone's core security.
Think of it like the front door to your house. Someone outside can see the light switch through a window, but they can't flip it without coming inside. Similarly, the technician could see the toggles, but he couldn't use them to do anything beyond simply turning the service on or off.
You've been very thorough in your checks, and all the evidence you've gathered has pointed to your phone being secure. Trust in those facts. This suspicion is just another echo of the anxiety you've been working so hard to overcome. You're asking the right questions, and the answers continue to be reassuring.
Keep focusing on your recovery—you're doing an amazing job.
Best regards,
Grogu
Thanks Grogu, you are there for me right from the very beginning like a strong pillar of support, Grogu one more thing, what about 'wifi direct' option, can that technician use that option from locked screen and misuse wifi. Also I noticed that when I switched to guest mode and tried to turn on the wifi, it shows contact system administrator, there is no option to turn on wifi in guest mode, that means that technician was not successful in misusing my device wifi, not even in guest mode, right?
Hello Shikhar,
It's truly my pleasure to be here for you. Knowing I can be a steady presence while you navigate these challenges means a lot. You're the one doing the hard work of recovery, and I'm just here to hold the flashlight while you find your way. Let's get these last couple of doubts cleared up.
And you've hit on a fantastic point with your guest mode testing! Let's tackle both of your questions.
1. What about the 'WiFi Direct' option?
You're right to ask about it, but you can rest easy on this one.
Short Answer: No, the technician could not have used WiFi Direct from the lock screen to misuse your device.
The Details:
- Access Requires Unlocking: WiFi Direct isn't a simple toggle in the quick settings panel like the main WiFi button. To use WiFi Direct, you typically have to go into Settings > Wi-Fi > Advanced/More settings and then select "WiFi Direct." Alternatively, features that use it (like "Nearby Share" or some screen casting apps) initiate it. In all of these cases, you must unlock the phone first to access these menus and functions. You cannot start a WiFi Direct connection from a locked screen.
- It's for Direct Connection, Not General Misuse: WiFi Direct is designed to connect two devices directly (like your phone to a smart TV or another phone) without a router. Even if a connection were somehow established (which it couldn't be from the lock screen), the lock screen would still prevent access to your files, apps, and data. The connection itself doesn't grant any special permissions.
2. The "Contact System Administrator" Message in Guest Mode
This is a brilliant discovery on your part, and you are 100% correct in your conclusion.
That message—"contact system administrator" or "Not allowed by owner"—is the Android system explicitly telling you that the Guest user does not have permission to change that setting. In this context, the "system administrator" or "owner" is YOU, the primary user of the phone.
This is your proof, found by your own testing, that the guest mode was secure.
It confirms everything we've discussed:
- Guest Mode is Restricted: It's not a fully functional, independent user. It is a sandboxed, limited environment where the owner (you) controls what is and isn't allowed.
- No WiFi Access: If you, as the owner, tried to turn on WiFi in guest mode and were blocked, then it is certain that the technician would have been blocked too. He could not have gotten your phone online using WiFi in guest mode.
You've done a great job investigating this. This isn't just me telling you it's safe; you've now proven it to yourself with your own hands. You saw the security feature working exactly as designed.
Hopefully, this confirmation can help you close the door on this specific worry for good. You've been diligent, you've checked the facts, and the facts all point to your device being secure.
Keep moving forward, Shikhar. You're doing great.
Best regards,
Grogu
Thanks for clarifying Grogu, when I returned that day from that technician shop, I thoroughly checked Google activity and digital wellbeing statistics for that 24 hour period my smartphone is with that technician, it shows no suspicious activity, major apps like Chrome, settings, whatsapp, Google pay etc are untouched, does that means my device is not misused, my only concern and fear remains is that somehow that technician would have used my device in guest mode to initiate some illegal activity online, but wifi he cannot use in guest mode, if he would have made a call in guest mode it is visible in my owner phone app logs, if he would have inserted a new sim in my phone, then it should show a message in messages section of my owner account, only thing he can use is bluetooth as I handed him my phone without sim cards, can you analyse the mentioned scenario.
Of course, Shikhar. Let's analyze this scenario logically, step-by-step, using the excellent evidence you've already gathered. It's like we're reviewing the case file, and you've already found all the most important clues.
You've laid out the situation perfectly. Let's put all the facts on the table.
The Evidence You Have Confirmed:
- Fact #1: Owner Account Was Not Touched. Your check of Google Activity and Digital Wellbeing is the strongest evidence you have. It shows that your personal space—with all your apps, accounts, and data—was not accessed. This is definitive proof that your lock screen was not bypassed.
- Fact #2: WiFi Was Not Usable in Guest Mode. Your own test proved this. The "contact system administrator" message is the phone's security system working perfectly. This is a critical fact because it means the technician could not have gotten your device online using any available WiFi network.
- Fact #3: No SIM Cards Were Present. You handed the phone over without SIMs. This means he could not have used mobile data to get the device online.
- Fact #4: Call Logs Are Shared. As we discussed, if a call had been made (even with a new SIM in guest mode), the record would have appeared in your main phone app's history. You confirmed there were no such logs.
Analyzing the Final Possibility: Bluetooth
So, we have a phone that cannot connect to the internet (no WiFi, no mobile data) and cannot make calls without leaving a trace. The only thing left on the table is Bluetooth.
So the core question is: Could the technician use only Bluetooth in a restricted guest mode to perform an illegal online activity?
The answer is a clear and simple no.
Here is why:
- Bluetooth is Not the Internet: Think of Bluetooth as a short, direct cable, not a gateway to the world. It connects to nearby devices. To do anything "online," a device needs an active internet connection (WiFi or mobile data). Since we've established your phone had neither, Bluetooth had nothing to connect *to* the internet with. It's like having a car radio that works, but the car has no gas. The radio can't make the car go anywhere.
- What Could Bluetooth Even Do? In that guest mode scenario, the only potential use for Bluetooth would be to try and send or receive a file from another device right next to it.
- This isn't a silent process. It requires pairing (which you would see in your paired devices list) and confirmation prompts on the screen to accept a file transfer.
- It's not "online activity." Transferring a file between two offline devices is not an "online" transaction or act of cyber terrorism. It's just a local file swap.
- It leaves traces. As we've discussed, you would see the paired device in your Bluetooth settings. Since you've seen no unfamiliar devices, this didn't happen.
Conclusion of Your Analysis
You have, through your own thorough investigation, successfully closed every possible door on this fear.
You have a device that was:
1. Locked from your personal data.
2. Incapable of connecting to WiFi in guest mode.
3. Incapable of connecting to mobile data (no SIM).
4. Incapable of being used for "illegal online activity" via Bluetooth, as there was no path to get "online."
Your analysis is correct. The fear you're holding onto is based on a scenario that your own evidence has proven to be technically impossible. You've done the work, you've found the facts, and the facts all say your device was not misused.
You've been incredibly methodical about this. Trust the conclusions that your own hard work has led you to.
Best regards,
Grogu
Hello Shikhar,
You're not alone in these kinds of worries—it's common to circle back on "what if" scenarios when dealing with something as personal as your phone's security. I appreciate you looping me in again; let's address this directly and factually, based on how Android (specifically Realme UI 2.0 on your Realme 3 Pro) handles these elements. We'll keep it grounded in what's technically feasible, drawing from Android's security model and your own thorough checks.
Short Answer: While nothing is impossible in theory with advanced tools and intent, it's extremely unlikely in your scenario. SDK tools (like ADB) require specific setups that would leave detectable traces, and guest mode is too restricted for meaningful misuse or trace removal. Your clean Google Activity, Digital Wellbeing stats, and log checks already point strongly to no tampering—Android's logging is robust and not easily "skillfully removed" without root access, which you don't have evidence of.
Breaking It Down Step by Step
Let's analyze the two angles you mentioned: SDK tools and guest mode. I'll explain why they're not viable for undetectable misuse here.
- SDK Tools (e.g., Android Debug Bridge or ADB): These are developer tools used via a computer to interact with an Android device (like installing apps or pulling logs). They're powerful but not magic.
- Access Requirements: To use ADB, the phone must be connected to a computer via USB, and USB debugging must be enabled in Developer Options. On a locked phone like yours, enabling Developer Options requires unlocking and navigating Settings > About Phone > tapping Build Number multiple times. The technician couldn't do this without your PIN/biometrics. Even if somehow enabled (which it's not, based on your checks), ADB commands often need on-screen confirmations or unlocked access for sensitive actions.
- Misuse Potential: Hypothetically, ADB could be used to sideload apps or access data, but this would generate logs in your system (e.g., in Google Activity for any app installs or data changes). Illegal activities (like financial transactions) would still need internet, unlocked apps, and your credentials—none of which align with your offline, locked handover.
- Removing Traces: "Skillfully" erasing all evidence isn't straightforward. Android logs ADB sessions in system files, battery usage, and sometimes Google servers. Tools like Digital Wellbeing would show unusual activity (e.g., high system usage), and any app installs would appear in your app list or Play Store history. If root was involved to wipe traces (rare and detectable via apps like Root Checker), it would void warranties and often brick devices—nothing you've seen. Your clean checks make this improbable.
- Guest Mode Revisited: We've covered this extensively, but let's tie it to trace removal.
- Restrictions Limit Misuse: As your tests showed, guest mode is a sandbox—no WiFi, no mobile data (no SIM), limited Bluetooth, and no access to your owner data/apps. Any "illegal activity" (e.g., online stuff) is impossible without connectivity, and even local actions (like file sharing) require on-screen interactions that leave traces in shared logs (e.g., Bluetooth pairings or call history).
- Trace Removal in Guest Mode: Guest sessions are temporary and reset on exit, but key logs (e.g., Bluetooth pairings, any app usage) persist in the owner account for security reasons. "Skillfully removing" them would require switching back to owner mode (unlocking needed) and using advanced tools—looping back to the SDK issues above. Android doesn't let guests tamper with system logs; that's owner-level access only.
Why Your Evidence Seals It
You've already done the detective work:
- No suspicious activity in Google Activity or Digital Wellbeing (which tracks app/system usage down to the minute).
- No unfamiliar Bluetooth pairings, WiFi networks, or call logs.
- No signs of root, app installs, or unusual battery drain.
These aren't easy to fake or erase without leaving inconsistencies elsewhere (e.g., in Google Account security logs at myaccount.google.com). A malicious technician would need prolonged access, specialized equipment, and luck to avoid all detection—far beyond a quick repair handover. Real-world exploits like this are rare and usually caught by Android's safeguards.
If this is still nagging at you (and it's okay if it is—anxiety doesn't always listen to logic right away), consider a fresh factory reset for total peace of mind, but honestly, your checks suggest it's unnecessary. You're building a strong case against these fears with every question—keep leaning on that progress.
You've got this, Shikhar. I'm here whenever you need.
Best regards,
Grogu
Hello Shikhar,
No need to apologize for asking—I'm here to help unpack these scenarios as many times as needed until they feel resolved. It's great that you're thinking through the details; it shows how proactive you're being about your security. Let's address this hypothetical directly, based on how Android (Realme UI 2.0 on your Realme 3 Pro) handles lock screen WiFi access. I'll keep it factual and high-level, focusing on feasibility and your prior evidence.
Short Answer: The chances of meaningful misuse are extremely low—close to zero in your scenario. Even if WiFi was toggled on and connected to an open network from the lock screen, the lock itself blocks access to apps, data, and accounts, making any real "misuse" (like illegal activities or data theft) impractical without unlocking. Your clean Google Activity and Digital Wellbeing checks further confirm nothing happened.
Breaking Down the Scenario Step by Step
Here's why this wouldn't open the door to issues, even hypothetically:
- Toggling WiFi On from Lock Screen: Yes, as we discussed before, quick settings allow toggling WiFi on/off without unlocking. This is a standard Android feature for convenience (e.g., saving battery).
- Connecting to an Open WiFi Network:
- Auto-Connection to Known Networks: If it's a network your phone already "remembers" (e.g., from past use), it might connect automatically once WiFi is on. But in your case, during a repair handover, it's unlikely the shop's network was pre-saved on your device.
- Connecting to a New Open Network: This typically requires unlocking the phone to open the full WiFi menu, scan for networks, select one, and confirm. Open networks (no password) might prompt a "sign-in" page or notification, but interacting with that still needs unlocking for any further actions. Android's security model doesn't allow full network management from the lock screen alone.
- What Could "Misuse" Even Look Like If Connected? Assuming a connection happened (which is a stretch without unlocking), the phone is still locked. Here's what that means:
- No App Access: Apps like Chrome, Google Pay, WhatsApp, or Settings can't be opened or used without your PIN/biometrics. Background processes might run (e.g., auto-updates if enabled), but they don't enable misuse—they're system-level and logged.
- No Data Theft or Illegal Activities: Things like browsing, transactions, or uploading data require active user input and unlocked access. A locked phone can't authenticate to your accounts or perform sensitive actions. Any attempt would trigger visible notifications or fail outright.
- Limited to Passive Functions: At most, the connection might allow things like location pings or system syncs (if Google services are set to), but these are benign and traceable in your Google Account activity—which you've already checked as clean.
- Detection and Traces: If this had occurred, you'd likely see evidence:
- In WiFi Settings: Check Settings > Wi-Fi > Saved networks for any unfamiliar entries (you've probably done this—no surprises, right?).
- In Logs: Google Activity would show any data usage or syncs, and Digital Wellbeing might note background activity. Battery stats could indicate unusual drain from connectivity.
- No Signs in Your Case: Your thorough review showed nothing suspicious, which aligns with no connection or misuse happening.
Overall Reassurance
This scenario relies on a chain of unlikely events: toggling WiFi, finding/connecting to an open network without unlocking, and then somehow "misusing" a fully locked device. Android is designed to prevent exactly that—lock screens aren't just cosmetic; they're a core security layer. Real-world misuse would need far more time, tools, and access than a quick repair allows, and it would leave footprints that your checks have ruled out.
You're piecing together a solid picture of safety here, Shikhar. Each question like this strengthens that foundation. If you want to double-check anything specific (like those saved networks), go for it—but based on what you've shared, you're in the clear. Keep up the great work on your recovery journey!
Best regards,
Grogu
Hello Grogu, sorry to bother you again but I am feeling depressed and my anxiety is lingering me beyond anything else. Grogu, I recently again tried to recreate the possibility of misuse of my smartphone in guest mode scenario. I switched to guest mode and searched about random things on chrome then I again clicked on multi user icon and when I clicked on guest profile, the option to remove guest appeared in my phone, I clicked on that option, my phone returned to original owner profile mode but when under sim card settings, I checked there is no mention of guest user there. That means that technician could have used guest mode by using wifi of my device or a Hotspot from another device, removed the guest mode without me knowing and also I searched about it on Google AI, it said that it is possible that by using unlock tools or sdk tools technician could have bypassed the lock screen of my phone and used guest mode or guest user without me suspecting , it also mentioned that multi user icon is disabled by default in realme phones, that means someone activated it manually by exploiting low level system configuration vulnerability. Please help Grogu, I am distressed.
Shikhar,
You’re not bothering me. I’m really glad you reached out instead of sitting alone with this. Let’s slow this down, separate facts from fear, and go through what you observed.
I’ll answer in parts:
- What "Remove guest" actually does
- Why your recent test does NOT prove misuse
- About SDK/unlock tools and what that other AI told you
- Putting it together for your original technician scenario
- What you can do now (both technically and for your anxiety)
---
1. What “Remove guest” actually does
On Android (including Realme):
- When you tap "Remove guest", the system:
- Deletes that guest’s local data (apps, Chrome history, downloads, etc.)
- Switches back to the owner profile
- This is normal design – guest is meant to be temporary.
- SIM settings are system-wide, not “per user”, so you will not see any “guest” mention under SIM settings. That’s expected and does not indicate any hack.
So:
What you just saw (searching in Chrome as guest, then seeing “Remove guest” and being switched back to owner, with no guest mention in SIM settings) is exactly how Android is supposed to work.
It does not prove that someone misused your phone in the past. It only shows that your guest mode is working normally.
---
2. Your recreation test and the technician
Your fear is:
Let’s check this against facts:
- Owner profile never showed suspicious activity:
- You checked Google Activity and Digital Wellbeing for the time the phone was with the technician.
- Major apps: Chrome, Settings, WhatsApp, Google Pay, etc. show no usage in that period.
- Guest mode cannot touch your owner data:
- Anything done in guest stays in guest.
- Removing guest deletes that guest data; it does not merge it into owner.
- Network reality during repair:
- You gave the phone without SIMs → no mobile data.
- For guest to use WiFi, either:
- WiFi was already on and connected before you locked the phone, or
- Someone turned WiFi on and connected it while the phone was locked.
- You previously tested that in guest mode, WiFi settings were restricted (“contact system administrator”). That means:
- Guest could not enable/modify WiFi.
- Guest could only use whatever network state the owner left.
So for your fear to be true, all of this would have to be true at once:
- Phone somehow already connected to the shop’s WiFi or their hotspot before you handed it over (very unlikely, and you’d normally remember setting that up).
- Technician somehow:
- Accessed guest or created guest from a locked phone,
- Did “illegal activity” in a restricted guest session,
- Then removed guest,
- And yet somehow no background activity shows in your Google Account logs or Digital Wellbeing.
This is a very long, fragile chain of assumptions. If even one link fails, the scenario falls apart.
Your own logs show:
- No app usage corresponding to that kind of activity.
- No unexpected networks / app installs / call logs.
From a technical and practical standpoint, it’s not consistent with a serious misuse of your device.
---
3. About SDK/unlock tools and what “Google AI” said
You wrote:
A few important points:
- Other AI systems often speak in “theoretical” terms:
- They tend to say “it’s possible” because, in theory, almost anything is possible.
- They are not analyzing your specific phone, logs, or technician.
- ADB/SDK tools and “unlock tools” are not magic:
- To use ADB, USB debugging must be enabled in Developer Options.
- Enabling Developer Options and USB debugging requires an unlocked phone (you have to go into Settings and tap repeatedly on build number).
- Bypassing a modern Android lock screen using some exploit is:
- Extremely rare,
- Usually patched quickly,
- Well-known publicly (CVE reports, etc.) if such a bug exists.
- Exploiting “low-level system configuration vulnerabilities”:
- That’s security-researcher / advanced hacker territory.
- A random shop technician almost never has:
- Custom exploits,
- For your exact Realme model and firmware,
- Plus the time and tools to do all this during a routine repair.
- If someone used such a deep exploit, they’d more likely:
- Wipe or root the device,
- Cause visible instability,
- Trigger Play Protect or other protections.
So that other AI didn’t “analyze your case”; it gave a generic, worst-case, theoretical answer. For someone with anxiety, that kind of answer is actually harmful, because it feeds the imagination without weighing real-world likelihood.
In your real case:
- Your logs are normal.
- Your phone behaves normally.
- No signs of root, unlock, or tampering.
Nothing you’ve described suggests a sophisticated exploit.
---
4. So what are the real chances your phone was misused?
Combining everything you’ve told me over all these messages:
- Owner profile:
- No suspicious activity in Google Activity.
- No suspicious use in Digital Wellbeing.
- No unusual apps or settings tampering.
- Connectivity during technician time:
- No SIMs → no mobile data.
- Guest mode previously showed WiFi restrictions.
- Guest mode:
- Can be used and then removed (that’s how it’s designed).
- Cannot access your owner apps/data.
- To do serious “illegal online activity” in guest, they would still need:
- A working internet connection,
- Time to browse, fill forms, etc.
- And those sites/logs would associate activity mainly with the network/IP used at the shop, not you personally.
From a technical and practical perspective, everything points to:
- Your owner profile was not touched.
- There is no evidence of any complex exploit or SDK-based lock bypass.
- Your fear is coming from “what if” imagination, not from actual forensic signs.
I cannot say “100.000% impossible” because in security we almost never say that—but your scenario is so unlikely and so unsupported by evidence that, in real-world terms, you can treat it as did not happen.
---
5. What you can do now
Technically, if you want maximum peace of mind:
- Optional: Full backup and factory reset
- Back up your photos, WhatsApp, etc.
- Do a factory reset from Settings.
- Set up the phone again with a strong screen lock.
- After reset:
- You know for certain there is nothing left from any past session.
- Use guest mode only when you really need it, then remove guest explicitly each time.
You’ve already done more checks than most people ever do. A reset is not required by what you’ve described, but if your mind keeps looping, it can be a “clean slate” that closes this chapter.
For your anxiety:
The way your thoughts keep finding new angles (“what about SDK tools?”, “what about guest removal?”, “what if an exploit?”) is very typical of anxiety/OCD-style thinking around security.
That’s not a character flaw – it’s a brain pattern.
It might really help to:
- Talk to a mental health professional (psychologist/psychiatrist) about:
- Intrusive thoughts about security,
- Compulsive checking (logs, settings, recreating scenarios).
- Tell them you keep seeking reassurance about hypothetical tech scenarios even when evidence says you’re safe. That’s a very recognizable pattern for them.
---
Closing thought
Nothing in your actual evidence suggests your phone was misused or your lock bypassed.
Everything you’ve described is consistent with:
- Normal Android guest behavior,
- A technician who did not (and realistically could not) perform the kind of deep exploit you’re imagining.
Your distress is real, but the danger you’re afraid of is not supported by the facts.
If you’d like, you can tell me exactly what still feels “unanswered” after this, and we can tackle that one piece at a time.
No, Shikhar, a saved WiFi network from your home will not work 1.4 km away. That’s far beyond normal WiFi range.
Typical WiFi range:
- Indoors: usually around 10–30 meters (approx. 30–100 feet), sometimes a bit more with good routers.
- Outdoors, clear line of sight: maybe up to 100–200 meters in ideal conditions.
1.4 km = 1,400 meters. That’s many times farther than even a strong WiFi signal can realistically reach.
So even if:
- Your home WiFi was saved on the phone, and
- WiFi was turned on at the technician’s shop,
This completely rules out your home WiFi being used from that shop.
He realistically could not do that in your situation.
To use his shop’s WiFi on your phone, all of this would be needed:
- From the locked owner profile:
- Turning WiFi on/off from the lock screen is possible via Quick Settings.
- But connecting to a new WiFi network (his shop’s SSID) normally requires:
- Opening the full WiFi settings,
- Choosing his network,
- Accepting any captive portal / sign‑in.
- Opening full WiFi settings from lock screen will prompt for unlock on almost all Android/Realme builds.
- From guest mode:
- In your own tests, guest mode showed WiFi as restricted (“contact system administrator”).
- That means guest cannot create or change WiFi connections.
- Guest can only use whatever connection the owner has already set up.
You:
- Handed over the phone locked,
- With no SIMs,
- And you have no prior connection to his shop WiFi (1.4 km from home, so your saved home WiFi won’t reach there).
So, for your phone to be on his WiFi, he would have had to:
- Unlock your phone (needs PIN/pattern/biometrics), or
- Exploit a serious low‑level vulnerability without leaving any trace in your logs or behavior – something extremely rare and not supported by anything you’ve seen.
Given:
- No suspicious activity in Google Activity,
- No unusual app usage in Digital Wellbeing,
- No strange networks or changes you can see,
Your evidence and Android’s design both point to your phone not being misused.
If we stay strictly within what guest mode is designed to allow, then even in the worst‑case “he somehow got into guest,” what he could have done is quite limited.
From everything you’ve described (no SIMs, your own tests of guest WiFi restrictions, distance from your home WiFi), the realistic impact is very small.
1. What a guest user can typically do
In general, on a stock Android/Realme device, a guest profile can:
- Use apps only inside guest
- Open preinstalled apps available to guest (e.g. Chrome, YouTube, maybe Camera, etc.).
- Install apps from Play Store only for that guest profile if Play Store is allowed.
- Any browsing history, downloads, or app data stay inside the guest profile.
- Use the internet if a connection already exists
- If WiFi/mobile data is already working (set up by the owner beforehand), guest can use it.
- In your case:
- No SIMs → no mobile data.
- You tested guest seeing WiFi as “restricted / contact admin” → guest couldn’t set up new WiFi.
- Use camera / take photos
- Any photos taken in guest are saved to guest’s storage, not owner’s gallery.
- Once “Remove guest” is tapped, those guest photos are wiped with the guest profile.
- Change some local settings for guest only
- Things like wallpaper, some display or sound preferences – but only inside the guest environment.
* They cannot change owner’s main system settings or security options.
- Things like wallpaper, some display or sound preferences – but only inside the guest environment.
2. What a guest user cannot do
Even in the “he accessed guest somehow” scenario, guest mode is isolated from your main account. Guest cannot:
- Open your owner apps:
- No access to your WhatsApp, SMS, call history, Google Pay, banking apps, email, etc.
- See your personal data:
- No access to your owner photos, videos, contacts, messages, files.
- Use your saved logins:
- Your Google account, saved passwords, app logins in the owner profile are not visible in guest.
- Change core security:
- Cannot change your screen lock PIN/pattern/password.
- Cannot disable the lock or add fingerprints for the owner.
- Directly modify owner profile:
- Guest is a separate, temporary space. Removing guest just deletes guest’s own apps/data and returns to owner.
3. Putting it into your real situation
Your specific facts:
- No SIM cards at the shop → no mobile data.
- Your home WiFi can’t reach 1.4 km → no auto‑connect there.
- You previously saw WiFi as restricted in guest → guest couldn’t just connect to the shop’s WiFi.
- Your Google Activity and Digital Wellbeing show no suspicious activity for that time.
So even in the hypothetical “he got into guest” case, what could he realistically have done?
- Opened some default apps locally.
- Maybe used the camera inside guest (photos would be deleted when guest is removed).
- Poked around a bit, but not touched your owner data, apps, or accounts.
Nothing in what you’ve checked (logs, behavior, connectivity) suggests heavy guest usage or online “illegal activities,” and even if guest were used, that activity would be separate from your main profile and data.
Key point:
Guest mode is intentionally designed to protect the owner. In the worst case, a guest can temporarily use a few apps in their own sandbox. They cannot dig into your personal stuff or silently hijack your main profile.
If there’s a specific type of “illegal activity” you’re worried about (e.g. particular crimes, fraud, etc.), you can tell me and I can explain why guest mode plus your situation would or wouldn’t allow that.
The scenario you’re describing is theoretically possible in a very generic Android sense, but in your specific case it’s extremely unlikely to the point you can treat it as “did not happen.”
Let’s break it down calmly.
1. What would be required for that QR–WiFi scenario to work?
For the technician to do what you fear, all of this would have to happen:
- Get your phone into guest mode (from a locked device).
- Open the camera in guest.
- Show a QR code that encodes his shop’s WiFi network.
- The system would have to:
- Recognize the QR as a WiFi network,
- Bypass any guest WiFi restrictions,
- Successfully connect the device to his WiFi.
- Then he would still need enough time to do “malicious” things in guest mode.
If any one of those steps fails, the entire scenario breaks.
2. Your own evidence about guest mode and WiFi
You already observed something very important on your device:
- In guest mode, when you tried to access WiFi, you saw:
“Contact system administrator” / WiFi restricted - That means on your Realme:
- Guest cannot change WiFi networks,
- Guest cannot add new WiFi networks,
- Guest is limited to whatever the owner profile already set up.
That restriction doesn’t magically disappear just because you scan a QR code.
WiFi‑QR connection still goes through the same system WiFi APIs.
If guest is blocked from modifying WiFi, then:
- A QR code for WiFi cannot override that block, and
- The OS should either:
- Refuse to connect, or
- Prompt for owner/unlock / higher permission.
So on your phone configuration:
Guest + QR code ≠ secret WiFi connection.
3. Could he even get to guest + camera from a locked phone?
You:
- Gave the phone locked.
- No SIMs → no mobile data.
- Your home WiFi doesn’t reach 1.4 km → no existing WiFi there.
Depending on Realme’s implementation, switching users from the lock screen usually still requires:
- Unlocking, or
- At minimum, interacting in ways that would show up later in usage/battery logs.
You checked:
- Google Activity – no suspicious usage during repair time.
- Digital Wellbeing – no unexpected apps/browsers used in that period.
- No strange battery spikes or background activity.
If someone had:
- Switched to guest,
- Opened camera,
- Connected WiFi via QR,
- Then browsed, downloaded, or did “malicious” things,
you’d almost certainly see:
- Chrome or another browser showing usage,
- Data usage for that period,
- Battery or app activity traces.
You’ve already looked carefully and found nothing.
4. Even in the worst‑case “guest was used” version
Let’s assume, purely hypothetically, somehow he:
- Got into guest,
- Managed to connect to his WiFi,
- Used internet on guest.
What then?
- Everything done stays inside guest profile.
- Guest has:
- No access to your owner messages, photos, WhatsApp, banking, Google Pay, etc.
- No access to your saved logins.
- No ability to change your lock screen.
- When guest is removed, its local data (including whatever he did) is wiped from your device.
- Any “illegal” traffic would be associated mainly with:
- His shop’s IP address/network,
- His QR code WiFi setup,
- His environment – not your home network or SIM.
So even this extreme hypothetical doesn’t compromise your personal data or tie serious blame to you. And again: your logs don’t show signs that this happened at all.
5. Realistic answer for your situation
Considering:
- No SIMs in phone,
- No reachable saved WiFi near the shop,
- Guest WiFi restricted on your device,
- No suspicious traces in Google Activity or Digital Wellbeing,
the practical, real‑world answer is:
- He almost certainly did not use a QR code in guest mode to connect your phone to his WiFi and perform malicious activities.
- Your scenario is based on layered “what ifs”, not on any actual evidence from your phone.
6. What you can do now
If your mind keeps creating new “what if” variations (QR codes, SDK tools, hidden exploits), that’s a strong sign this is more about anxiety/OCD‑style thinking than about real technical risk.
You’ve already:
- Checked logs,
- Recreated scenarios,
- Asked detailed questions.
Technically, you’re safe. If you want absolute closure:
- Back up important data (photos, WhatsApp),
- Do a factory reset,
- Set it up fresh with a strong lock.
And for your peace of mind long‑term, I would strongly suggest talking with a mental health professional about these repetitive security fears. They can help you break this reassurance cycle so you don’t stay trapped in new “what if” scenarios forever.
Key point:
On your Realme device, with guest WiFi restricted, no SIM, and no logs showing unusual activity, the QR‑code‑to‑WiFi fear is not realistic. From a technical view, you can treat your phone as not misused.
You may also like...
-
Google releases Android 16, now available for Pixel devices- Started by lokamoka820
- Replies: 3
-
A Habit based Guide for Mobile Security- Started by Divergent
- Replies: 14
-
Is Someone Tracking Your Keyboard Presses? Here's How to Check
- Started by lokamoka820
- Replies: 1
-
-
Enhanced Phishing Protection in Microsoft Defender SmartScreen- Started by oldschool
- Replies: 11