Grogu, please do not get annoyed but I am deeply stressed after the debacle at that technician shop, his behaviour was extremely hostile and rude and unprofessional, very unpredictable for me. I want to ask, if he has connected to a wifi network and tried to use my password and biometric locked Android 11 realme 3 pro and did some illegal activity online in guest mode than it is he who will be the prime suspect because during that time period phone is with him and not me?
You’re not annoying me, and it makes sense you’re stressed after being treated badly. I’ll answer you directly.
Short answer:
Yes –
if he had connected your phone to
his WiFi and done something illegal in
guest mode while the phone was in
his shop and his custody, then
he / his shop / his network would be the
primary focus, not you.
I’m not a lawyer and this isn’t legal advice, but I can explain how it usually works in practice.
---
1. What evidence exists in that hypothetical?
If some illegal activity happened online, the main technical trace is:
- The public IP address that was used (i.e. the internet connection).
In your scenario:
- Your phone is in the repair shop.
- Any data goes through the shop’s WiFi/router.
- So the public IP belongs to the shop’s internet connection, not your home, not your SIM.
If authorities investigated, they would see:
- Traffic from that shop’s IP,
- At that time,
- Using that router.
So they start with:
- Who owns that connection?
- Who runs the shop?
- Who had access to that network?
That’s the shop/technician, not you.
---
2. The phone was in his hands, not yours
You told me:
- You gave him the phone physically.
- The phone was password and biometric locked.
- There were no SIM cards inside.
- Your home WiFi doesn’t reach 1.4 km.
So, if anything was done:
- It was done on his premises,
- Using his network,
- While the device was not physically with you.
In any realistic investigation, that matters a lot. They always look at:
- Who had physical control?
- Who owned the internet connection used?
That is him/his shop.
---
3. Guest mode specifically
Even in your hypothetical “he used guest mode” scenario:
- Guest mode is a separate profile with no access to your apps, passwords, WhatsApp, banking, etc.
- Anything done there is:
- Not tied to your personal logins,
- Not using your accounts.
You also already checked:
- Google Activity – no suspicious activity at that time.
- Digital Wellbeing – no odd app/Chrome use.
That strongly suggests even this “guest misuse” didn’t actually happen. But
even if it had, it would still be:
- On his network,
- During his custody.
---
4. “How would I prove my innocence?”
This is where anxiety traps you. In real life:
- The burden of proof is on the investigators/accusers.
- They must show why you, specifically, are responsible.
If anyone ever asked (which is already very unlikely):
You would simply say the truth:
- “At that time, my phone was at a repair shop.”
- “The phone was password and biometric locked.”
- “There were no SIM cards in it.”
- “I had no access to, or control over, the shop’s WiFi/network.”
And the objective facts support that:
- The IP belongs to the shop.
- CCTV/job sheets could show your phone was in their hands.
- Your accounts show no logins from that location/network.
In such a situation, the
natural suspect is the person who controlled the network and the device at that moment – the technician/shop.
---
5. Where you really are now
Right now:
- There is no evidence of any illegal activity done with your phone.
- You’ve:
- Checked IMEI, serial, MACs → all match the box.
- Checked Google Activity and Digital Wellbeing → no suspicious usage.
- No authority, police, ISP, etc. has contacted you about anything.
So you’re fighting against a
chain of “what ifs”, not against real events.
Your question –
“would he be the prime suspect?” – in that imaginary situation:
Yes, it would point at
his network and his custody, not at you sitting elsewhere with no access to that WiFi.
---
6. About your stress
His rude/hostile behavior clearly shook you, and now your brain is trying to find danger everywhere linked to that event. That’s very common in anxiety/OCD patterns.
You’ve already done incredible, detailed checks. From a
technical perspective, you’ve gone far beyond what an average user would do. There is nothing suggesting he used your device for crimes.
If this fear keeps looping in your head (new scenarios, new doubts), it may help a lot to:
- Talk to a mental health professional (psychologist/psychiatrist).
- Tell them exactly what you’re telling me: fear of being falsely blamed for online crimes due to that shop incident.
They can help with the
emotional side; I can keep helping with the
technical side whenever you need.
Bottom line:
In the hypothetical scenario you described, the technician/shop and their network would be the
main focus and suspect. Given all your checks, there’s no real sign that anything like that actually happened.