Technology's laptop Config.

[Secondmineboy]

@technology : You may want to take a look at this program:

Update - Clean Slate 10 Build 4823

 

[JM Safe]

Update:

Removed:
- Eset Smart security
- EXE Radar
- Defraggler
- Process Lasso

Enabled:
- Windows Defender
- Windows Firewall
- Shadow Defender ( from on-demand to real-time )
- Windows Defragment and Optimize Drives

Added:
PatchMyPC

@technology Why did you remove EXE Radar and Eset Smart Security? And then, for me Process Lasso is a really good software to keep our PC more fast and optimized; why did you remove it?

 

[technology]

@technology : You may want to take a look at this program:

Update - Clean Slate 10 Build 4823

thnx for suggestion, I'l give it a try

@technology Why did you remove EXE Radar and Eset Smart Security? And then, for me Process Lasso is a really good software to keep our PC more fast and optimized; why did you remove it?

actually with shadow defender work on real time all my system was virtualized and protected so I remove both prog.
regarding Process Lasso, it make multitasking run smooth specially on low-mid end devices, I'm still using it on my home pc, but didn't see that much different on my laptop

 

[technology]

Update:
Add:
SEP " Symantec Endpoint Protection" Customized

Remove :
Shadow defender from Realtime to on-demand

 

[Deleted member 178]

Update:
Add:
SEP " Symantec Endpoint Protection" Customized

i envy you ^^

 

[JM Safe]

thnx for suggestion, I'l give it a try


actually with shadow defender work on real time all my system was virtualized and protected so I remove both prog.
regarding Process Lasso, it make multitasking run smooth specially on low-mid end devices, I'm still using it on my home pc, but didn't see that much different on my laptop

Thanks for the reply @technology

 

[JM Safe]

Update:
Add:
SEP " Symantec Endpoint Protection" Customized

Remove :
Shadow defender from Realtime to on-demand

Good updates Also for me is better to maintain SD to on-demand

 

[technology]

yesterday, I've test SEP vs zero-day cryptolocker samples in VM, Sonar did a good job by catching it and clean the system but it remain files crypted

 

[technology]

Update:
Added
- Comodo internet security
- Poweriso
- Slimjet

Removed:
- SEP
- Ultraiso

 

[Brahman]

yesterday, I've test SEP vs zero-day cryptolocker samples in VM, Sonar did a good job by catching it and clean the system but it remain files crypted

ouch.....

 

[Online_Sword]

it remain files crypted

This problem is also found by some Norton users, though Sonar in NS is a little different from Sonar in SEP.

 

[JM Safe]

Update:
Added
- Comodo internet security
- Poweriso
- Slimjet

Removed:
- SEP
- Ultraiso

Good adding

 

[technology]

This problem is also found by some Norton users, though Sonar in NS is a little different from Sonar in SEP.

I don't think there is a different in sonar, what I know that Norton is better in PUP detection than SEP

Good adding

thanks

 

[Online_Sword]

I don't think there is a different in sonar

A difference is that in version of SONAR Framework: in Norton 22 (the current version) it has been 9.x, while for SEP 12.1 it is just 8.x (8.0.0.137 currently).

Please note that Norton 21 also uses SONAR Framework 8.x, but there are still some differences between SONAR in SEP 12.1 and SONAR in Norton 21. Some tests (conducted by users in the online case) have shown that there are some malwares that can be prevented and removed by SONAR in Norton 21, but are missed by SONAR in SEP 12.1.5 (current version is 12.1.6).

 

[technology]

A difference is that in version of SONAR Framework: in Norton 22 (the current version) it has been 9.x, while for SEP 12.1 it is just 8.x (8.0.0.137 currently).

Please note that Norton 21 also uses SONAR Framework 8.x, but there are still some differences between SONAR in SEP 12.1 and SONAR in Norton 21. Some tests (conducted by users in the online case) have shown that there are some malwares that can be prevented and removed by SONAR in Norton 21, but are missed by SONAR in SEP 12.1.5 (current version is 12.1.6).

That's weird ,TY for info.

 

[Online_Sword]

That's weird

As far as I know, the reason why SONAR in SEP has a low prevention rate (compared to SONAR in Norton) is probably because SONAR in SEP does not have the definitions of threats that are identified as "SONAR.Heurstic.1xx". By contrast, a large percent of malwares prevented by SONAR in Norton are classified as "SONAR.Heuristc.120", "SONAR.Heuristc.121" and "SONAR.Heuristc.132".

You can find the full list of the threat defnitions in SONAR in the link below:

A-Z Listing of Threats & Risks - Symantec Corp.

 

[Deleted member 178]

you have to know that SEP protection is stronger than NIS.

my review

Symantec Endpoint Protection (review & explanation)

 

[technology]

update:

Added:
- spyshelter premium v. 10.6.1
- NVT exe radar
- Spybot Anti-Beacon

Removed:
- Chrome

 

[technology]

Update:

Added:
- ESET NOD32
- ReHIPS
- Auslogics Disk Defrag (Portable)

Removed:
- Comodo Internet Security
- spyshelter premium v. 10.6.1

 

[technology]

I think i'll stay with this config. for a while