Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
The Comodo's challenge.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ErzCrz" data-source="post: 1078978" data-attributes="member: 81799"><p>Thanks.</p><p></p><p>Yes, the file would not be contained because containment isn't being used and I get that this is still a bypass of Containment as the service is disabled but, am I right in thinking that the Document5 would still be blocked if you changed the setting to not show alerts and just block untrusted files?</p><p></p><p>Most of the time I prefer that a file is just blocked outright rather than run in a sandbox so I was just checking that this part of the containment element still blocks the untrusted file.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ErzCrz, post: 1078978, member: 81799"] Thanks. Yes, the file would not be contained because containment isn't being used and I get that this is still a bypass of Containment as the service is disabled but, am I right in thinking that the Document5 would still be blocked if you changed the setting to not show alerts and just block untrusted files? Most of the time I prefer that a file is just blocked outright rather than run in a sandbox so I was just checking that this part of the containment element still blocks the untrusted file. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top
