Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Anti-Malware & Privacy Apps
The Shadowra's Battlefield Antivirus 2021
Message
<blockquote data-quote="harlan4096" data-source="post: 968813" data-attributes="member: 36043"><p>Some comments / what I see in the malware pack:</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">As in most of the video tests in general, many samples even can't run (probably are not even malware).</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Others samples are probably legit (or even with a valid digital signing), or considered legit by some av firms, but not for others. Probably Apps with bundle “adware/PUP/PUA”, where the installation, in many cases, depends on the user selection, and this is the reason some avs firms don't consider them in their detections.</li> </ul><p>Also, it would be interesting to differentiate in final Second Opinion Results:</p><ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">How many of the defections of Second Opinion Scanners are actually resident running (or are just inactive leftovers/remnants, see point 2.) -> System Infected</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">How many of the defections of Second Opinion Scanners are just inactive (not detected in original sample folder) -> System Not Clean</li> </ol><p>In Hub, before running SOS, I delete all the original samples (of course, those that are not active running). I don't count in final Second Opinion Scanners results the original samples remained and not active running, or those original samples that probably remained, but their payload were blocked/detected in dynamic.</p><p></p><p>Different method, different criteria he he <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite109" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="harlan4096, post: 968813, member: 36043"] Some comments / what I see in the malware pack: [LIST] [*]As in most of the video tests in general, many samples even can't run (probably are not even malware). [*]Others samples are probably legit (or even with a valid digital signing), or considered legit by some av firms, but not for others. Probably Apps with bundle “adware/PUP/PUA”, where the installation, in many cases, depends on the user selection, and this is the reason some avs firms don't consider them in their detections. [/LIST] Also, it would be interesting to differentiate in final Second Opinion Results: [LIST=1] [*]How many of the defections of Second Opinion Scanners are actually resident running (or are just inactive leftovers/remnants, see point 2.) -> System Infected [*]How many of the defections of Second Opinion Scanners are just inactive (not detected in original sample folder) -> System Not Clean [/LIST] In Hub, before running SOS, I delete all the original samples (of course, those that are not active running). I don't count in final Second Opinion Scanners results the original samples remained and not active running, or those original samples that probably remained, but their payload were blocked/detected in dynamic. Different method, different criteria he he :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top