Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="ForgottenSeer 92963" data-source="post: 970042">TWO FLAWS IN THIS TEST:<ol>
<li data-xf-list-type="ol">DID YOU CHECK THE SAMPLES WERE REALLY MALWARE AND EXECUTED CORRECTLY? THIS COULD EXPLAIN THE CORRUPTED FILES. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite118" alt=":oops:" title="Oops!&nbsp; &nbsp; :oops:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":oops:" /> 
 
</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ol">TESTED SEQUENTIALLY (SHOOTING TIME 10 HOURS), NOT IN PARALLEL MIGHT INFLUENCE RESULTS WITH AV&#039;s SHARING DETECTIONS (e.g. VT).&nbsp; <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite132" alt=":unsure:" title="Unsure&nbsp; &nbsp; :unsure:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":unsure:" /></li>
</ol>QUESTION: ARE THE AV&#039;s WITH THE BEST DETECTIONS TESTED LAST? IF SO, YOU HAVE PROVEN THAT SHARING SAMPLES WORKS. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite109" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> I really applaud your time and effort you put into these tests. Also even when you buy additional 10 pc&#039;s and test AV&#039;s at the same time and run the malware samples in a sandbox to check they are not corrupted and really infect the system, you must make sure your ISP and DNS don&#039;t have any kind of malware detection or url monitoring in their &#039;extended/additional&#039;&nbsp; service offering because this could affect bad URL detection also. I feel a bit sorry for you, all that time and effort you put in this test. Enjoy your holiday. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite130" alt="(y)" title="Thumbs up&nbsp; &nbsp; (y)" loading="lazy" data-shortname="(y)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="ForgottenSeer 92963, post: 970042"] [B]TWO FLAWS IN THIS TEST:[/B] [LIST=1] [*][B]DID YOU CHECK THE SAMPLES WERE REALLY MALWARE [B]AND EXECUTED CORRECTLY? T[/B]HIS COULD EXPLAIN THE CORRUPTED FILES. :oops:[/B] [*][B]TESTED SEQUENTIALLY (SHOOTING TIME 10 HOURS), NOT IN PARALLEL MIGHT INFLUENCE RESULTS WITH AV's SHARING DETECTIONS (e.g. VT). :unsure:[/B] [/LIST] [B]QUESTION: ARE THE AV's WITH THE BEST DETECTIONS TESTED LAST? IF SO, YOU HAVE PROVEN THAT SHARING SAMPLES WORKS. :)[/B] [SIZE=3] I really applaud your time and effort you put into these tests. Also even when you buy additional 10 pc's and test AV's at the same time and run the malware samples in a sandbox to check they are not corrupted and really infect the system, you must make sure your ISP and DNS don't have any kind of malware detection or url monitoring in their 'extended/additional' service offering because this could affect bad URL detection also. I feel a bit sorry for you, all that time and effort you put in this test. Enjoy your holiday. (y)[/SIZE] [/QUOTE]

Verification